Literature DB >> 6841806

A procedure for detecting variability of psychophysical thresholds.

J L Hall.   

Abstract

In adaptive psychophysical testing, it is desirable to identify experimental runs during which the subject's threshold changes. This is not easy to do, because the testing level changes during the course of the run. The following screening procedure can assist in detecting threshold variability. At the conclusion of the run, determine for each trial the discrepancy between observed and expected response. Next, determine the linear regression of this discrepancy upon trial number. If the subject's response behavior is stable and well described by the psychometric function, then the expected value of slope of the linear regression is equal to zero. If the observed slope differs greatly from zero, then it is unlikely that the subject's response behavior is stable. Results from computer simulations and psychophysical experiments are presented.

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6841806     DOI: 10.1121/1.388958

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  8 in total

1.  Estimation of psychometric functions from adaptive tracking procedures.

Authors:  M R Leek; T E Hanna; L Marshall
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1992-03

2.  Using 10AFC to further improve the efficiency of the quick CSF method.

Authors:  Fang Hou; Luis Lesmes; Peter Bex; Michael Dorr; Zhong-Lin Lu
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Maximum-likelihood psychometric procedures in two-alternative forced-choice: evaluation and recommendations.

Authors:  R Madigan; D Williams
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1987-09

4.  Two-alternative versus three-alternative procedures for threshold estimation.

Authors:  B R Shelton; I Scarrow
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1984-04

5.  Evaluating the performance of the staircase and quick Change Detection methods in measuring perceptual learning.

Authors:  Pan Zhang; Yukai Zhao; Barbara Anne Dosher; Zhong-Lin Lu
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Comparing Spatial Contrast Sensitivity Functions Measured With Digit and Grating Stimuli.

Authors:  Haiyan Zheng; Menglu Shen; Xianghang He; Rong Cui; Luis Andres Lesmes; Zhong-Lin Lu; Fang Hou
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2019-11-15       Impact factor: 3.283

7.  Performance metrics for an application-driven selection and optimization of psychophysical sampling procedures.

Authors:  Mike D Rinderknecht; Olivier Lambercy; Roger Gassert
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-11-28       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Psychophysics with children: Investigating the effects of attentional lapses on threshold estimates.

Authors:  Catherine Manning; Pete R Jones; Tessa M Dekker; Elizabeth Pellicano
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 2.199

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.