Literature DB >> 6841185

The quality of life of patients following treatment for laryngeal cancer.

A R Harwood, E Rawlinson.   

Abstract

One hundred and twenty-nine patients have been interviewed 9 to 15 months following treatment for laryngeal cancer to determine the post treatment quality of voice and life. The patients were subdivided into 3 groups, successfully irradiated T1 and T2 patients, (89 patients), successfully irradiated T3 and T4 patients (24 patients) and those treated by surgery (16 patients). Ninety-three percent of T1 and T2 patients and 79% of T3 and T4 patients are working following treatment as compared to 44% of the surgery patients. Ninety-eight percent of the T1 and T2 and 87.5% of the T3 and T4 patients were able to use the telephone normally as compared to 12% of the surgery patients. Similarly major differences between the successfully irradiated patients and the surgically treated patients in terms of ability to live a normal social life have been noted. The patients also rated their voice in terms of volume, pitch, ability to communicate, quality, rate of speech, flow of speech and dry throat. In every parameter of rating of the voice, with the exception of dryness of the throat, the successfully irradiated patients in all stage groupings had better ratings than the surgery group. Since, in Toronto, survival in advanced glottic and supraglottic cancer is the same using radical radiation with surgery in reserve as survival with primary surgery, it is concluded in view of the superior quality of voice and life in the successfully irradiated patients that irradiation with surgery in reserve is the optimal treatment for these patients. We also conclude that the measurement of quality of life in patients with cancer of the larynx is of vital importance in determining optimal treatment and that further studies in this area are indicated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6841185     DOI: 10.1016/0360-3016(83)90292-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  6 in total

1.  Voice after laryngectomy.

Authors:  M Gleeson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-01-04

2.  Automatic speaking valve in speech rehabilitation for laryngectomized patients.

Authors:  Hanna Tervonen; Leif Bäck; Anja Juvas; Pirjo Räsänen; Antti A Mäkitie; Harri Sintonen; Risto P Roine; Erkki Vilkman; Leena-Maija Aaltonen
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2005-03-01       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Pretreatment computed tomographic gross tumor volume as predictor of persistence of tracheostomy and percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube in patients undergoing larynx preservation.

Authors:  Newton J Hurst; Lucio M Pereira; Michael M Dominello; Gregory Dyson; Pamela Laszewski; Natasha Robinette; Ho-Sheng Lin; George Yoo; Ammar Sukari; Harold Kim
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2016-04-30       Impact factor: 3.147

Review 4.  Assessing quality of life in head and neck cancer.

Authors:  C C Gotay; T D Moore
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  Predictive factors of toxicity of TPF induction chemotherapy for locally advanced head and neck cancers.

Authors:  Maureen Bernadach; Michel Lapeyre; Anne-Françoise Dillies; Jessica Miroir; Melanie Casile; Juliette Moreau; Ioana Molnar; Angeline Ginzac; Nathalie Pham-Dang; Nicolas Saroul; Xavier Durando; Julian Biau
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2021-04-07       Impact factor: 4.430

6.  Injection laryngoplasty during transoral laser microsurgery for early glottic cancer: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Ayham Al Afif; Matthew H Rigby; Colin MacKay; Timothy F Brown; Timothy J Phillips; Usman Khan; Jonathan R B Trites; Martin Corsten; S Mark Taylor
Journal:  J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2022-03-22
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.