Literature DB >> 6840302

Experience with 143 cases of tubal surgery.

E E Wallach, L R Manara, E Eisenberg.   

Abstract

Results of tubal reconstructive surgery must be periodically reviewed. This approach permits evaluation of improvements in individual techniques as well as comparison with the results of others performing similar surgery. It also enables meaningful dialogue between physician and patient regarding prospects for success in the physician's own hands. The senior author's experience with 143 cases of tubal reconstructive surgery is presented. Results of four distinct tubal reconstructive procedures are compared with results reported in the available microsurgical and macrosurgical literature. The term pregnancy rate was 45.7% for those who underwent lysis of adhesions, 50.0% among the tubal anastomosis group, and 20.8% among patients treated with a two-stage salpingostomy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biology; Evaluation; Fallopian Tubes; Genitalia; Genitalia, Female; Infertility; Pennsylvania; Physiology; Pregnancy; Reproduction; Surgery; Treatment; Urogenital System

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6840302     DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)47054-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  3 in total

1.  Implications of pattern of tubal disease for microsurgery or in vitro fertilization in Lagos.

Authors:  B K Ogedengbe; O F Giwa-Osagie; E E Emuveyan
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 1.798

2.  Factors influencing the success of microsurgery for distal tubal occlusion.

Authors:  T J Laatikainen; A K Tenhunen; P K Venesmaa; D L Apter
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 2.344

Review 3.  Is There Still a Place for Reconstructive Surgery in Distal Tubal Disease?

Authors:  Bogdan Obrzut; Marzanna Obrzut
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-06-08       Impact factor: 4.964

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.