Literature DB >> 6839540

Genetic control of eosinophilia. Mouse strain variation in response to antigens of parasite origin.

D Wakelin, A M Donachie.   

Abstract

Strain variation in capacity to develop peripheral blood eosinophilia was observed in inbred NIH and C57BL/10 (B10) mice exposed to parasite antigens by infection or by parenteral injection in Freund's complete adjuvant. NIH mice were good responders, showing rapid development of high eosinophil counts, B10 mice were low responders. The difference in response phenotype was independent of the parasite used for infection (Trichinella spiralis or Nematospiroides dubius) and of the antigen used for injection (T. spiralis larval antigen or Limulus haemocyanin). Pre-treatment of T. spiralis infected mice with low doses of cyclophosphamide (150 mg/kg) or restriction of the duration of infection to 7 days by anthelmintic treatment did not enhance the response of B10 mice. Thus no evidence was found that the poor response phenotype of B10 during T. spiralis infection reflected any active suppressive mechanisms developed during the adult or muscle larval phases of infection. Demonstration that eosinophilia is induced primarily by the intestinal phase allows comparison with other parameters of the immune response induced by the adult worms, namely intestinal mastocytosis and worm expulsion. From this comparison it is concluded that the low eosinophil response phenotype of B10 mice may reflect a generalized deficiency in the response of bone marrow derived precursor cells to factors of T lymphocyte origin. The significance of genetically determined variation in eosinophil responsiveness is discussed in relation to the development of protective immune or pathological responses to parasite infection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6839540      PMCID: PMC1536896     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol        ISSN: 0009-9104            Impact factor:   4.330


  22 in total

Review 1.  The regulatory and effector roles of eosinophils.

Authors:  P F Weller; E J Goetzl
Journal:  Adv Immunol       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 3.543

2.  Genetic control of eosinophilia in mice: gene(s) expressed in bone marrow-derived cells control high responsiveness.

Authors:  M A Vadas
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  1982-02       Impact factor: 5.422

3.  Antigen-mediated release of eosinophil growth stimulating factor from Trichinella spiralis sensitized spleen cells: a comparison of T. spiralis stage-specific antigen preparations.

Authors:  S H Bartelmez; W H Dodge; D A Bass
Journal:  Immunology       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 7.397

4.  Cyclophosphamide pretreatment induces eosinophilia to nonparasite antigens.

Authors:  M A Vadas
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  1981-11       Impact factor: 5.422

5.  Basophils and eosinophils in three strains of rats and in athymic (nude) rats following infection with the nematodes Nippostrongylus brasiliensis or Trichinella spiralis.

Authors:  B M Ogilvie; P W Askenase; M E Rose
Journal:  Immunology       Date:  1980-03       Impact factor: 7.397

6.  Specific cross-immunity between Trichinella spiralis and Trichuris muris: immunization with heterologous infections and antigens and transfer of immunity with heterologous immune mesenteric lymph node cells.

Authors:  T D Lee; R K Grencis; D Wakelin
Journal:  Parasitology       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 3.234

7.  Genetic factors controlling the intestinal mast cell response in mice infected with Trichinella spiralis.

Authors:  H Alizadeh; D Wakelin
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  1982-08       Impact factor: 4.330

8.  Genetic control of immunity to Trichinella spiralis. Donor bone marrow cells determine responses to infection in mouse radiation chimaeras.

Authors:  D Wakelin; A M Donachie
Journal:  Immunology       Date:  1981-08       Impact factor: 7.397

9.  Alterations in blood eosinophil morphology, binding capacity for complexed IgG and kinetics in patients with tropical (filarial) eosinophilia.

Authors:  C J Spry
Journal:  Parasite Immunol       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 2.280

10.  Eosinophils and resistance to Trichinella spiralis.

Authors:  D I Grove; A A Mahmoud; K S Warren
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  1977-03-01       Impact factor: 14.307

View more
  7 in total

1.  Antigen-specific T-cell lines transfer protective immunity against Trichinella spiralis in vivo.

Authors:  J Riedlinger; R K Grencis; D Wakelin
Journal:  Immunology       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 7.397

2.  Genetic control of eosinophilia. Analysis of production and response to eosinophil-differentiating factor in strains of mice infected with Trichinella spiralis.

Authors:  D A Lammas; L A Mitchell; D Wakelin
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 4.330

3.  T-helper subset function in the gut of rats: differential stimulation of eosinophils, mucosal mast cells and antibody-forming cells by OX8- OX22- and OX8- OX22+ cells.

Authors:  C H Wang; M Korenaga; A Greenwood; R G Bell
Journal:  Immunology       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 7.397

4.  L3T4-positive T lymphoblasts are responsible for transfer of immunity to Trichinella spiralis in mice.

Authors:  R K Grencis; J Riedlinger; D Wakelin
Journal:  Immunology       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 7.397

5.  Host protective immunity to Trichinella spiralis in mice: activation of Th cell subsets and lymphokine secretion in mice expressing different response phenotypes.

Authors:  R K Grencis; L Hültner; K J Else
Journal:  Immunology       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 7.397

Review 6.  Immunity to the model intestinal helminth parasite Heligmosomoides polygyrus.

Authors:  Lisa A Reynolds; Kara J Filbey; Rick M Maizels
Journal:  Semin Immunopathol       Date:  2012-10-11       Impact factor: 9.623

7.  Between-population differences in constitutive and infection-induced gene expression in threespine stickleback.

Authors:  Lauren E Fuess; Jesse N Weber; Stijn den Haan; Natalie C Steinel; Kum Chuan Shim; Daniel I Bolnick
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2021-10-18       Impact factor: 6.622

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.