Literature DB >> 6835383

A new method of scanning electron microscopy for imaging biological tissues.

A Boyde, S A Reid.   

Abstract

The scanning electron microscope (SEM) has proved of little value in the examination of material prepared for light microscopic histology. One of the chief reasons for this is that the secondary electron signal used for image formation in routine scanning microscopy derives from the surface of the specimen. In the case of histological material this surface is one which has been severely distorted by processing and cutting procedures. Light microscopy sections can be usefully studied in te SEM if the signal used to form the image derives from a considerable portion of the thickness of the section. Thus the backscattered electron (BSE) image has been successfully used in studying the distribution of dense material or densely staining components several micrometres deep to the surface of dried sections. Such sections are, however, usually mounted on low density (poorly BSE reflecting) non-transparent substrates such as beryllium or carbon, so that matching light microscopy of the same samples is not possible. We report here a method by which histological sections mounted on glass slides can be imaged in the SEM at a resolution higher than that obtained using conventional light microscopy. The method exploits the facts that the ordinary, cheap light microscope slide is strongly cathodoluminescent, yet the standard histological (7 micrometers) section is of such a mass thickness that it absorbs a significant proportion of electrons which energies (5-20 keV) usually used in biological SEM. Thus the measure of the glass cathodoluminescence signal is the measure of the electron flux passing through the specimen.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6835383     DOI: 10.1038/302522a0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  2 in total

1.  Scanning electron microscopy of cells and tissues under fully hydrated conditions.

Authors:  Stephan Thiberge; Amotz Nechushtan; David Sprinzak; Opher Gileadi; Vered Behar; Ory Zik; Yehuda Chowers; Shulamit Michaeli; Joseph Schlessinger; Elisha Moses
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-02-26       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Bone mineralization is elevated and less heterogeneous in adults with type 2 diabetes and osteoarthritis compared to controls with osteoarthritis alone.

Authors:  J M Pritchard; A Papaioannou; C Tomowich; L M Giangregorio; S A Atkinson; K A Beattie; J D Adachi; J DeBeer; M Winemaker; V Avram; H P Schwarcz
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2013-01-26       Impact factor: 4.398

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.