Literature DB >> 6832759

Morphometric grading of bladder tumors in comparison with histologic grading by pathologists.

E C Ooms, P H Kurver, R W Veldhuizen, C L Alons, M E Boon.   

Abstract

The authors describe the results of the grading of bladder tumors using morphometry and then compare these with results of histologic grading of the same tumors by different pathologists. Nuclear sizes of cells obtained from superficial and deep cell layers of each carcinoma and from giant cells were measured in 27 cases in which histologic tumor grading by different pathologists was unequivocal. In cells from all three areas, nuclear area increased with higher tumor grade. However, tumors of grades I and II showed significant differences in the size only of the large cells. It is concluded that morphometry is a valuable tool in the objective grading of bladder tumors, with the exception of carcinoma in situ lining the bladder lumen.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6832759     DOI: 10.1016/s0046-8177(83)80243-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Pathol        ISSN: 0046-8177            Impact factor:   3.466


  16 in total

1.  Improved objectivity of grading of T(A,1) transitional cell carcinomas of the urinary bladder by quantitative nuclear and proliferation related features.

Authors:  M G Bol; J P Baak; P C de Bruin; S Rep; W Marx; S Bos; O Kisman
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  Accuracy of grading of urothelial carcinoma on urine cytology: an analysis of interobserver and intraobserver agreement.

Authors:  Michelle D Reid; Adeboye O Osunkoya; Momin T Siddiqui; Stephen W Looney
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2012-10-20

3.  Observer variability in histopathological reporting of transitional cell carcinoma and epithelial dysplasia in bladders.

Authors:  A J Robertson; J S Beck; R A Burnett; S R Howatson; F D Lee; A M Lessells; K M McLaren; S M Moss; J G Simpson; G D Smith
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  [Karyometry of BBN-induced precancerosis of the urothelium : An experimental analysis].

Authors:  H H Dahm; V Lehnen-Holtum; H Rübben
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 0.639

5.  Grading of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.

Authors: 
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1989-05-20

6.  The reproducibility of cytomorphometrical grading of bladder tumours.

Authors:  H G van der Poel; M E Boon; E A vand er Meulen; A Wijsman-Grootendorst
Journal:  Virchows Arch A Pathol Anat Histopathol       Date:  1990

7.  Argyrophilic proteins of the nucleolar organizer region in bladder-tumours.

Authors:  E C Ooms; R W Veldhuizen
Journal:  Virchows Arch A Pathol Anat Histopathol       Date:  1989

8.  Karyometric investigations on urinary bladder carcinoma, correlated to histopathological grading.

Authors:  K Helander; P A Hofer; G Holmberg
Journal:  Virchows Arch A Pathol Anat Histopathol       Date:  1984

9.  Proliferation markers and DNA content analysis in urinary bladder TaT1 urothelial cell carcinomas: identification of subgroups with low and high stage progression risks.

Authors:  M G W Bol; J P A Baak; B van Diermen; S Buhr-Wildhagen; E A M Janssen; K H Kjellevold; A J Kruse; O Mestad; P Øgreid
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Can cytomorphometry replace histomorphometry for grading of bladder tumours?

Authors:  H G van der Poel; M E Boon; L P Kok; J Tolboom; B van der Meulen; E C Ooms
Journal:  Virchows Arch A Pathol Anat Histopathol       Date:  1988
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.