Literature DB >> 6827877

The role of perceived price in physicians' demand for diagnostic tests.

M J Long, K M Cummings, K B Frisof.   

Abstract

This research examines the extent of physicians implicit price knowledge and its role in the physicians' demand for diagnostic tests. In particular, it examines the effect of perceived price on the quantity of test ordered. A group of 36 second and third-year residents and 23 clinical faculty members in three family practice centers affiliated with the Family Medicine Department of Wayne State University were randomly assigned to either a control group or an experimental group. They were asked to review four case studies and indicate on a test order form the tests they would order. The experimental group used a test order form that included the actual test prices and the control group used the same form but without the prices included. Subsequent to this, the control group (those without actual price information) was asked to estimate the price of all tests listed. Physicians' implicit price knowledge was measured by the number of underestimates, overestimates, and correct estimates and correlated with the total number of tests ordered. The results show the following tendencies: 1) physicians generally incorrectly estimate prices; 2) they tend to underestimate rather than overestimate; 3) they tend to underestimate the higher priced tests and overestimate the lower priced tests; 4) the greater the propensity to underestimate, the greater the number of tests ordered; 5) the greater the propensity to overestimate, the fewer the number of tests ordered; and 6) the greater the propensity to correctly estimate, the fewer the number of tests ordered. The results indicate that in the absence of actual prices, perceived prices enter the physicians' demand function and that physicians' demand for diagnostic tests might be categorized as rational.

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6827877     DOI: 10.1097/00005650-198302000-00011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care        ISSN: 0025-7079            Impact factor:   2.983


  11 in total

Review 1.  Pathology tests: is the time for demand management ripe at last?

Authors:  G Gopal Rao; M Crook; M L Tillyer
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  Do family physicians know the costs of medical care? Survey in British Columbia.

Authors:  G Michael Allan; Grant D Innes
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.275

3.  Do physicians' perceptions of drug costs influence their prescribing?

Authors:  M Ryan; B Yule; C Bond; R J Taylor
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 4.  Effects of feedback of information on clinical practice: a review.

Authors:  M Mugford; P Banfield; M O'Hanlon
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-08-17

5.  Scottish general practitioners' attitudes and knowledge in respect of prescribing costs.

Authors:  M Ryan; B Yule; C Bond; R J Taylor
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1990-05-19

6.  The cost of medicines in the United Kingdom. A survey of general practitioners' opinions and knowledge.

Authors:  J Silcock; M Ryan; C M Bond; R J Taylor
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 4.981

7.  Laboratory investigations in general practice.

Authors:  S Salloum; E Franssen
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 3.275

8.  Internal medicine physicians' knowledge of health care charges.

Authors:  Raj Tek Sehgal; Paul Gorman
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2011-06

9.  How Primary Care Physicians Integrate Price Information into Clinical Decision-Making.

Authors:  Katherine H Schiavoni; Lisa Soleymani Lehmann; Wendy Guan; Meredith Rosenthal; Thomas D Sequist; Alyna T Chien
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2016-08-25       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  Portuguese Family Physicians' Awareness of Diagnostic and Laboratory Test Costs: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Luísa Sá; Cristina Costa-Santos; Andreia Teixeira; Luciana Couto; Altamiro Costa-Pereira; Alberto Hespanhol; Paulo Santos; Carlos Martins
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-10       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.