Literature DB >> 6823058

Detection and correction of house staff error in physical diagnosis.

N P Wray, J A Friedland.   

Abstract

A significant number of errors in physical examination can be detected when house staff are observed by attending physicians. In this study, observation of residents and interns showed a total error of 13.1% and 15.6%, respectively, with incorrect findings of 3.3% and 4.9% and omitted findings of 9.8% and 10.7%, respectively. Approximately two thirds of all patients examined had at least one error noted. A method was instituted for detecting and correcting these errors that can be integrated into daily attending rounds. Using this method, a statistically significant decrease in the number of errors was shown. The method used emphasizes the physical examination pertinent to the patient's main problem, consumes very little rounding time, and is well received by both attending physicians and house officers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6823058

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  23 in total

1.  A picture is worth a thousand words: practical use of videotape in teaching.

Authors:  L E Pinsky; J E Wipf
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Reforming internal medicine residency training. A report from the Society of General Internal Medicine's task force for residency reform.

Authors:  Eric S Holmboe; Judith L Bowen; Michael Green; Jessica Gregg; Lorenzo DiFrancesco; Eileen Reynolds; Patrick Alguire; David Battinelli; Catherine Lucey; Daniel Duffy
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 3.  Update in medical education.

Authors:  Shobhina G Chheda; Reena Karani; Kathel Dunn; Stewart Babbott; Carol K Bates
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Self-confidence in and perceived utility of the physical examination: a comparison of medical students, residents, and faculty internists.

Authors:  Edward H Wu; Mark J Fagan; Steven E Reinert; Joseph A Diaz
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2007-10-06       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 5.  Physical diagnosis in the 1990s. Art or artifact?

Authors:  S Mangione; S J Peitzman
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Attending rounds: a survey of physician attitudes.

Authors:  K Kroenke; J O Simmons; J B Copley; C Smith
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1990 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 7.  Physical examination education in graduate medical education--a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Somnath Mookherjee; Lara Pheatt; Sumant R Ranji; Calvin L Chou
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Flipping the Physical Examination: Web-Based Instruction and Live Assessment of Bedside Technique.

Authors:  Dustyn E Williams; John W Thornton
Journal:  Ochsner J       Date:  2016

9.  Clinical skills of medical residents: a review of physical examination.

Authors:  C Chan-Yan; J H Gillies; J Ruedy; J S Montaner; S A Marshall
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1988-10-01       Impact factor: 8.262

10.  The Objective Structured Clinical Examination. The new gold standard for evaluating postgraduate clinical performance.

Authors:  D A Sloan; M B Donnelly; R W Schwartz; W E Strodel
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 12.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.