Literature DB >> 682243

Treatment of pyonephrosis: a comparative study.

J F Jimenez, M A Lopez Pacios, G Llamazares, J Conejero, F Sole-Balcells.   

Abstract

Our study is a comparison of treatments used for 97 patients with pyonephrosis. The patients were divided into 3 groups: 1) cases in which a primary nephrectomy was done, 2) cases in which nephrectomy was secondary to drainage through a nephrostomy and 3) cases in which nephrectomy was secondary to drainage through a translumbar percutaneous puncture with an Ingram catheter indwelling. Patients in whom nephrostomy and puncture were used had the highest percentage of complications, while primary nephrectomy produced the best results. Therefore, we believe that primary nephrectomy is the procedure of choice, using drainage through a puncture only when the general status of the patient does not permit primary nephrectomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1978        PMID: 682243     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)57139-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  3 in total

1.  The management of pyonephrosis.

Authors:  G S Harrison
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 1.891

2.  Generalized peritonitis after spontaneous rupture of pyonephrosis: a case report.

Authors:  Desalegn Markos Shifti; Kebebe Bekele
Journal:  Int Med Case Rep J       Date:  2018-05-15

3.  A giant case of pyonephrosis resulting from nephrolithiasis.

Authors:  Ali Erol; Soner Coban; Ali Tekin
Journal:  Case Rep Urol       Date:  2014-07-03
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.