Literature DB >> 6821810

Pathologic findings from the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast Project. VIII. Relationship of chemotherapeutic responsiveness to tumor differentiation.

E R Fisher, C Redmond, B Fisher.   

Abstract

The possible influence of histologic grade, necrosis and size of invasive breast cancers on the five year survival rate of women treated in NSABP clinical trials with regimens of L-PAM (P) and L-PAM + 5-FU (PF) and for four years in those receiving L-PAM + 5-FU + methotrexate (PMF) was investigated. Generally, all regimens effected an increased survival when compared to controls that did not receive adjuvant therapy. However, this favorable response was statistically more pronounced in those women whose cancers were histologically evaluated to be poorly differentiated (histologic grade 3) and exhibited four or more regional axillary nodal metastases. Patients whose cancers were associated with 1-3 nodal metastases were not found to exhibit statistically significant responsiveness to any regimen regardless of tumor grade. Possible reasons for this dichotomy are presented. Tumor necrosis, although paralleling the results noted with histologic grade, failed to further discriminate patients who might respond to chemotherapeutic agents. Tumor size was not found to be a consistently significant indicator of chemotherapeutic responsiveness. Generally, the PF and PMF regimens were more effective than P alone in those patients exhibiting a response. These findings indicate the importance of identifying subsets of patients with breast cancer not only from a biologic but also therapeutic perspective.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6821810     DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19830115)51:2<181::aid-cncr2820510202>3.0.co;2-a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  8 in total

1.  NSABP trials of adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. A further look at the evidence.

Authors:  C B Mueller; M L Lesperance
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 2.  Adjuvant chemotherapy for early breast cancer.

Authors:  I E Smith
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1983-08-06

3.  Occupational type affects the receipt of breast cancer adjuvant chemotherapy in China.

Authors:  Zhengzhi Zhu; Qiang Huo; Shengying Wang; Qifeng Yang
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2015-08-04       Impact factor: 2.967

4.  Tumor nuclear grade, estrogen receptor, and progesterone receptor: their value alone or in combination as indicators of outcome following adjuvant therapy for breast cancer.

Authors:  B Fisher; E R Fisher; C Redmond; A Brown
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 4.872

5.  Scar cancers: pathologic findings from the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast Project (protocol no. 4) - IX.

Authors:  E R Fisher; A S Palekar; R Sass; B Fisher
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 4.872

6.  Macrophage-Induced Lymphangiogenesis and Metastasis following Paclitaxel Chemotherapy Is Regulated by VEGFR3.

Authors:  Dror Alishekevitz; Svetlana Gingis-Velitski; Orit Kaidar-Person; Lilach Gutter-Kapon; Sandra D Scherer; Ziv Raviv; Emmanuelle Merquiol; Yael Ben-Nun; Valeria Miller; Chen Rachman-Tzemah; Michael Timaner; Yelena Mumblat; Neta Ilan; David Loven; Dov Hershkovitz; Ronit Satchi-Fainaro; Galia Blum; Jonathan P Sleeman; Israel Vlodavsky; Yuval Shaked
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2016-10-25       Impact factor: 9.423

7.  Variations in the management and survival of women under 50 years with breast cancer in the South East Thames region.

Authors:  M A Richards; C D Wolfe; K Tilling; J Barton; H M Bourne; W M Gregory
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 7.640

8.  S-phase fraction and survival benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy or radiotherapy of breast cancer.

Authors:  O Stål; L Skoog; L E Rutqvist; J M Carstensen; S Wingren; S Sullivan; A C Andersson; M Dufmats; B Nordenskjöld
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 7.640

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.