Literature DB >> 6818192

Cancer of the uterine cervix: dosimetric guidelines for prevention of late rectal and rectosigmoid complications as a result of radiotherapeutic treatment.

H Pourquier, J B Dubois, R Delard.   

Abstract

This paper is the report of a dosimetric study of 41 rectal and rectosigmoid complications after radiotherapeutic treatment (1974-1978) of 287 cervical uterine tumors. Treatment consisted of external irradiation (25 MeV linear accelerator) and intracavitary irradiation (Fletcher-Suit applicator) at different doses depending on tumor stage. Dosimetric measurements were expressed as the maximum rectal dose and mean rectal dose on the anterior surface of the rectum, as proposed by the Groupe Européen de Curiethérapie. Rectal doses were also studied as a function of intracavitary irradiation and intracavitary + external irradiation (maximum rectal and mean cumulative doses for each). The results show a significant difference in the state of the patients with and without complications, based on the dose reaching the rectum. The maximum and the mean cumulative rectal doses serve as one of the primary indicators for predicting complications. These values should therefore be determined before placement of intracavitary sources or, at the latest, before the second intracavitary application. We have shown that there is no fixed threshold dose, but that it varies from one region to another, depending on level of external irradiation. Our results argue in favor of adapting individual patient therapy based on simple precautions, which are adjustable to all treatment modalities. This method could lead to complete elimination of late rectal and rectosigmoid complications arising from radiotherapeutic treatment of cervical uterine cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 6818192     DOI: 10.1016/0360-3016(82)90446-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  6 in total

Review 1.  Complications of radiation therapy and factors in their prevention.

Authors:  J D Cox; R W Byhardt; J F Wilson; J S Haas; R Komaki; L E Olson
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Should helical tomotherapy replace brachytherapy for cervical cancer? Case report.

Authors:  Chen-Hsi Hsieh; Ming-Chow Wei; Yao-Peng Hsu; Ngot-Swan Chong; Yu-Jen Chen; Sheng-Mou Hsiao; Yen-Ping Hsieh; Li-Ying Wang; Pei-Wei Shueng
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2010-11-23       Impact factor: 4.430

3.  Influence of brachytherapy applicators geometry on dose distribution in cervical cancer.

Authors:  E Senkus-Konefka; A Kobierska; J Jassem; K Serkies; A Badzio
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Clinical features, outcome and risk factors in cervical cancer patients after surgery for chronic radiation enteropathy.

Authors:  Jianbo Yang; Chao Ding; Tenghui Zhang; Liang Zhang; Tengfei Lv; Xiaolong Ge; Jianfeng Gong; Weiming Zhu; Ning Li; Jieshou Li
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2015-06-06       Impact factor: 3.481

5.  Brachytherapy-emulating robotic radiosurgery in patients with cervical carcinoma.

Authors:  Simone Marnitz; Christhardt Köhler; Volker Budach; Oliver Neumann; Anne Kluge; Waldemar Wlodarczyk; Ulrich Jahn; Bernhard Gebauer; Markus Kufeld
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2013-05-02       Impact factor: 3.481

6.  Stereotactic body radiation therapy via helical tomotherapy to replace brachytherapy for brachytherapy-unsuitable cervical cancer patients - a preliminary result.

Authors:  Chen-Hsi Hsieh; Hui-Ju Tien; Sheng-Mou Hsiao; Ming-Chow Wei; Wen-Yih Wu; Hsu-Dong Sun; Li-Ying Wang; Yen-Ping Hsieh; Yu-Jen Chen; Pei-Wei Shueng
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 4.147

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.