Literature DB >> 6814361

Fate in model ecosystems of microbial species of potential use in genetic engineering.

L N Liang, J L Sinclair, L M Mallory, M Alexander.   

Abstract

The changes in populations of Staphylococcus aureus, Bacillus subtilis, Salmonella typhimurium, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Agrobacterium tumefaciens, Rhizobium meliloti, and Saccharomyces cerevisiae were measured after their introduction into samples of sewage, lake water, and soil. Enumeration of small populations was possible because the strains used were resistant to antibiotics in concentrations and combinations such that few species native to these ecosystems were able to grow on agar containing the inhibitors. Fewer than 2 cells per ml of sewage or lake water and 25 cells per g of soil could be detected. A. tumefaciens and R. meliloti persisted in significant numbers with little decline, but S. aureus, K. pneumoniae, S. typhimurium, S. cerevisiae, and vegetative cells of B. subtilis failed to survive in samples of sewage and lake water. In sterile sewage, however, K. pneumoniae, B. subtilis, S. typhimurium, A. tumefaciens, and R. meliloti grew; S. cerevisiae populations were maintained at the levels used for inoculation; and S. aureus died rapidly. In sterile lake water, the population of S. aureus and K. pneumoniae and the number of vegetative cells of B. subtilis declined rapidly, R. meliloti grew, and the other species maintained significant numbers with little or a slow decline. The populations of S. aureus, K. pneumoniae, A. tumefaciens, B. subtilis, and S. typhimurium declined in soil, but the first four species grew in sterile soil. It is suggested that some species persist in environments in which they are not indigenous because they tolerate abiotic stresses, do not lose viability readily when starved, and coexist with antagonists. The species that fails to survive need only be affected by one of these factors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1982        PMID: 6814361      PMCID: PMC242080          DOI: 10.1128/aem.44.3.708-714.1982

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  12 in total

1.  Bacterial predator-prey interaction at low prey density.

Authors:  M Varon; B P Zeigler
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1978-07       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Are Spore-forming Bacteria of any Significance in Soil under Normal Conditions?

Authors:  H J Conn
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1916-03       Impact factor: 3.490

3.  Further evidence for the regulation of bacterial populations in soil by protozoa.

Authors:  M Habte; M Alexander
Journal:  Arch Microbiol       Date:  1977-06-20       Impact factor: 2.552

4.  Estimating the density of individual bacterial populations introduced into natural ecosytems.

Authors:  S K Danso; M Habte; M Alexander
Journal:  Can J Microbiol       Date:  1973-11       Impact factor: 2.419

5.  Coliform inhibition by bacteriocin-like substances in drinking water distribution systems.

Authors:  E G Means; B H Olson
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1981-09       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 6.  Why microbial predators and parasites do not eliminate their prey and hosts.

Authors:  M Alexander
Journal:  Annu Rev Microbiol       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 15.500

7.  Protozoa as agents responsible for the decline of Xanthomonas campestris in soil.

Authors:  M Habte; M Alexander
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1975-02

8.  Comparative survival of indicator bacteria and enteric pathogens in well water.

Authors:  G A McFeters; G K Bissonnette; J J Jezeski; C A Thomson; D G Stuart
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1974-05

9.  Survival of two enterobacteria in feces buried in soil under field conditions.

Authors:  K L Temple; A K Camper; G A McFeters
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1980-10       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  Bacterial survival in a dilute environment.

Authors:  R E Sjogren; M J Gibson
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1981-06       Impact factor: 4.792

View more
  37 in total

1.  Survival in soils of an herbicide-resistant Pseudomonas putida strain bearing a recombinant TOL plasmid.

Authors:  J L Ramos; E Duque; M I Ramos-Gonzalez
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Genetically Engineered Erwinia carotovora in Aquatic Microcosms: Survival and Effects on Functional Groups of Indigenous Bacteria.

Authors:  V S Scanferlato; D R Orvos; J Cairns; G H Lacy
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Competition between Two Isolates of Denitrifying Bacteria Added to Soil.

Authors:  R E Murray; L L Parsons; M S Smith
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Genetically Engineered Erwinia carotovora: Survival, Intraspecific Competition, and Effects upon Selected Bacterial Genera.

Authors:  D R Orvos; G H Lacy; J Cairns
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Phenotypic drift inBradyrhizobium japonicum populations after introduction into soils as established by numerical analysis.

Authors:  B Brunel; J M Boeufgras; D Bernillon; R Bardin
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 4.552

6.  Dynamic interactions ofPseudomonas aeruginosa and bacteriophages in lake water.

Authors:  O A Ogunseitan; G S Sayler; R V Miller
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 4.552

7.  Explanation for the decline of bacteria introduced into lake water.

Authors:  K R Gurijala; M Alexander
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 4.552

8.  Microbial trophic interactions in aquatic microcosms designed for testing genetically engineered microorganisms: A field comparison.

Authors:  N Kroer; R B Coffin
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 4.552

9.  Persistence of genetically engineeredErwinia carotovora in perturbed and unperturbed aquatic microcosms and effect on recovery of indigenous bacteria.

Authors:  V S Scanferlato; G H Lacy; J Cairns
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 4.552

10.  Role of resistance to starvation in bacterial survival in sewage and lake water.

Authors:  J L Sinclair; M Alexander
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1984-08       Impact factor: 4.792

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.