Literature DB >> 6810166

Hypersensitivity of ataxia telangiectasia skin fibroblasts to DNA alkylating agents.

T R Barfknecht, J B Little.   

Abstract

3 ataxia telangiectasia (AT) fibroblast cell strains, AT4BI, AT5BI and AT2BE (CRL1343) were studied for their colony-forming ability after treatment with various concentrations of 4 different DNA alkylating agents. The results were compared to the response of fibroblast strains from 3 normal individuals. None of the AT strains were abnormally sensitive to N-methyl-N'-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine. 1 strain (AT5BI) was significantly more sensitive to treatment with methyl methanesulfonate (MMS) based on a survival curve D0 value of 0.29 mM vs. the normal average D0 of 0.38 mM (P less than 0.02) and a D10 value of 0.85 mM vs. the normal average D10 of 1.2 mM (P less than 0.025). Strain AT4BI was also significantly more sensitive to MMS treatment when D10 values were compared (0.73 mM, P less than 0.01). All 3 AT cell strains were significantly more sensitive to treatment with ethyl methanesulfonate when D10 values were the criterion of sensitivity, AT4BI 16 mM, AT5BI 13 mM and AT2BE 15 mM vs. the normal human fibroblast average D10 value of 28 mM (P less than 0.01 for all 3 AT strains). 2 of the 3 AT cell strains (AT4BI and AT2BE) were abnormally sensitive to treatment with 4-nitroquinoline-1-oxide; the D0 values were 0.045 microM and 0.05 microM, respectively, vs. the normal average D0 value of 0.11 microM (P less than 0.01 for both AT strains). The corresponding D10 values were 0.08 microM and 0.11 microM, respectively, vs. the normal average D10 value of 0.27 microM (P less than 0.01 for AT4BI and P less than 0.025 for AT2BE). These results indicate that there is a heterogeneity in the response of AT fibroblast cell strains to treatment with DNA alkylating agents, except possibly in the case of ethylating compounds.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1982        PMID: 6810166     DOI: 10.1016/0027-5107(82)90299-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutat Res        ISSN: 0027-5107            Impact factor:   2.433


  8 in total

Review 1.  The ATM protein kinase: regulating the cellular response to genotoxic stress, and more.

Authors:  Yosef Shiloh; Yael Ziv
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 94.444

2.  ATM-dependent DNA damage-independent mitotic phosphorylation of H2AX in normally growing mammalian cells.

Authors:  Kirk J McManus; Michael J Hendzel
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2005-07-19       Impact factor: 4.138

3.  Repair of endogenous DNA base lesions modulate lifespan in mice.

Authors:  Lisiane B Meira; Jennifer A Calvo; Dharini Shah; Joanna Klapacz; Catherine A Moroski-Erkul; Roderick T Bronson; Leona D Samson
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2014-06-30

4.  PARP inhibition during alkylation-induced genotoxic stress signals a cell cycle checkpoint response mediated by ATM.

Authors:  Michael J Carrozza; Donna F Stefanick; Julie K Horton; Padmini S Kedar; Samuel H Wilson
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2009-08-31

Review 5.  Ataxia-telangiectasia: an inherited disorder of ionizing-radiation sensitivity in man. Progress in the elucidation of the underlying biochemical defect.

Authors:  P J McKinnon
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 4.132

6.  A role for DEAD box 1 at DNA double-strand breaks.

Authors:  Lei Li; Elizabeth A Monckton; Roseline Godbout
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2008-08-18       Impact factor: 4.272

7.  The prion protein is critical for DNA repair and cell survival after genotoxic stress.

Authors:  Anne Bravard; Frédéric Auvré; Damiano Fantini; Jacqueline Bernardino-Sgherri; Ludmilla Sissoëff; Mathieu Daynac; Zhou Xu; Olivier Etienne; Capucine Dehen; Emmanuel Comoy; François D Boussin; Gianluca Tell; Jean-Philippe Deslys; J Pablo Radicella
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2014-12-24       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  Modulation of proteostasis counteracts oxidative stress and affects DNA base excision repair capacity in ATM-deficient cells.

Authors:  Mattia Poletto; Di Yang; Sally C Fletcher; Iolanda Vendrell; Roman Fischer; Arnaud J Legrand; Grigory L Dianov
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2017-09-29       Impact factor: 16.971

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.