Literature DB >> 6805363

Epidural morphine for postoperative pain relief: a dose-response curve.

R Martin, J Salbaing, G Blaise, J P Tétrault, L Tétreault.   

Abstract

Different doses of epidural morphine were studied in order to determine their effectiveness in providing postoperative pain relief after surgery of the lower extremities and their relationship to the incidence of untoward reactions. The study was carried out in a double-blind fashion using five dosages of epidural morphine (0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 4.0, and 8.0 mg) and included 60 patients. The higher doses of morphine (2.0, 4.0, and 8.0 mg) were equally effective and more effective than the lower doses (0.5 and 1.0 mg) in providing postoperative analgesia. Nausea and vomiting were encountered more frequently with the highest dose (8.0 mg) and this finding was statistically significant (P less than 0.03). No statistically significant difference was found between the doses studied with regard to itching, urinary retention, and respiratory depression; the latter was evaluated in a subgroup of 20 patients. These data suggest that effective postoperative pain relief after surgery of the lower extremities can be achieved with relatively low doses of morphine sulfate and with minimal side effects. For the type of surgery studied, 2 mg morphine sulfate appeared to be the optimum dose.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1982        PMID: 6805363     DOI: 10.1097/00000542-198206000-00002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesthesiology        ISSN: 0003-3022            Impact factor:   7.892


  10 in total

1.  Optimum dose of epidural morphine for postsurgical analgesia.

Authors:  G Ochi; C Yamane; T Arai
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 2.078

Review 2.  Epidural opiate analgesia for acute pain relief.

Authors:  A N Sandler
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 5.063

3.  Epidural morphine prophylaxis of postoperative pain: report of a double-blind multicentre study.

Authors:  W D Writer; J B Hurtig; D Evans; R E Needs; C E Hope; J B Forrest
Journal:  Can Anaesth Soc J       Date:  1985-07

4.  Equipotent dose regimens required when comparing epidural opioids.

Authors:  J Chrubasik; S Chrubasik; P Glass
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 5.063

5.  The usefulness of postoperative continuous epidural morphine in abdominal surgery.

Authors:  K Masuo; A Yasui; Y Nishida; K Kumagai; Y Sanada; A Yoshitoshi; Y Shinagawa
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 6.  Side effects of intrathecal and epidural opioids.

Authors:  M A Chaney
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 5.063

Review 7.  Respiratory depression and spinal opioids.

Authors:  R C Etches; A N Sandler; M D Daley
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 5.063

8.  Pharmacokinetics of epidural morphine in man.

Authors:  G Nordberg; T Hedner; T Mellstrand; L Borg
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 2.953

9.  Epidural morphine reduces halothane MAC in humans.

Authors:  I M Schwieger; C E Klopfenstein; A Forster
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 5.063

10.  Caudal morphine for pain relief following anal surgery.

Authors:  H Farag; M Naguib
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 1.891

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.