Literature DB >> 6804415

The economic impact of alternative cardiac care unit treatment practices.

J A Greenberg, R Kropf.   

Abstract

A case-mix strategy was used with hospital chart-abstract data from New Jersey to estimate the hypothetical savings in the cost of Cardiac Care Unit (CCU) care in the state that would result from the state-wide implementation of the following five policies: limiting uncomplicated Acute-Myocardial Infraction (AMI) patients to seven days of hospitalization; treating uncomplicated AMI patients at home; using the CCU only for diagnoses for which it is widely accepted as effective; tightening CCU admission criteria; and tightening CCU discharge criteria. The selection of these policies was based on a review of the CCU literature and on empirical data from the New Jersey CCU system. The case-mix strategy involved; the creation and categorization of a list of diagnoses which are eligible for CCU treatment; the selection of a sample of hospitals for study; and the estimation of the savings which would result from the implementation of the hypothetical CCU policies throughout the state. The estimated savings were substantial compared to the total cost of CCU care in New Jersey, stressing the need for further investigation of the cost-effectiveness of current CCU treatment practices. In addition, the case-mix method used in this study is recommended for bringing considerations of the cost-effectiveness of clinical practice into public policy debates on the regulation of medical services.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 6804415      PMCID: PMC1068661     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Serv Res        ISSN: 0017-9124            Impact factor:   3.402


  8 in total

1.  Dollar and human costs of intensive care.

Authors:  A Morgan; C Daly; B J Murawski
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  1973-05       Impact factor: 2.192

2.  End results, cost and productivity of coronary-care units.

Authors:  B S Bloom; O L Peterson
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1973-01-11       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Bed rest in acute myocardial infarction: a study of physician practices.

Authors:  M Duke
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1971-10       Impact factor: 4.749

4.  Surgical manpower. A comparison of operations and surgeons in the United States and in England and Wales.

Authors:  J P Bunker
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1970-01-15       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Myocardial infarction: unit care or home care?

Authors:  O L Peterson
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1978-02       Impact factor: 25.391

6.  A randomised trial of home-versus-hospital management for patients with suspected myocardial infarction.

Authors:  J D Hill; J R Hampton; J R Mitchell
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1978-04-22       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Myocardial infarction: a comparison between home and hospital care for patients.

Authors:  H G Mather; D C Morgan; N G Pearson; K L Read; D B Shaw; G R Steed; M G Thorne; C J Lawrence; I S Riley
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1976-04-17

8.  Acute myocardial infarction: home and hospital treatment.

Authors:  H G Mather; N G Pearson; K L Read; D B Shaw; G R Steed; M G Thorne; S Jones; C J Guerrier; C D Eraut; P M McHugh; N R Chowdhury; M H Jafary; T J Wallace
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1971-08-07
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.