Literature DB >> 6803581

A benefit-cost analysis of mumps vaccine.

J P Koplan, S R Preblud.   

Abstract

Applying benefit-cost analysis, we determined the savings in morbidity, mortality, and costs of mumps vaccination in the United States. Using reported mumps incidence rates in a model cohort of 1 million persons followed up for 30 years, mumps vaccination would prevent more than 74,000 cases of mumps and three deaths. Approximating the actual incidence rate of mumps, by assuming that 90% of people are infected by age 30 and 60% of these have had clinical illness, mumps vaccination would prevent more than 540,000 cases of mumps and 23 deaths. A mumps vaccination program, in which mumps was given as part of a measles-mumps-rubella combination, would reduce costs associated with mumps by more than 86%, with a benefit-cost ratio of 7.4:1, using reported incidence rates. The program has a benefit-cost ratio of 39:1 when approximations of actual mumps incidence are used in the analysis. Mumps vaccination is highly cost beneficial.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1982        PMID: 6803581     DOI: 10.1001/archpedi.1982.03970400080021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Dis Child        ISSN: 0002-922X


  10 in total

1.  Evaluating the benefits of increasing measles immunization rates.

Authors:  J Zwanziger; P G Szilagyi; P Kaul
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 2.  Pharmacoeconomics of immunisation: a review.

Authors:  R van den Oever; D de Graeve; B Hepp; A Stroobant; D Walckiers; V Van Casteren; F Van Loock; G Ducoffre; J Dewatripont; P Jacques
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  Mumps in the US Army 1980-86: should recruits be immunized?

Authors:  D R Arday; D D Kanjarpane; P W Kelley
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Population-based versus practice-based recall for childhood immunizations: a randomized controlled comparative effectiveness trial.

Authors:  Allison Kempe; Alison Saville; L Miriam Dickinson; Sheri Eisert; Joni Reynolds; Diana Herrero; Brenda Beaty; Karen Albright; Eva Dibert; Vicky Koehler; Steven Lockhart; Ned Calonge
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2012-12-13       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Management of patients with congenital hypothyroidism.

Authors:  G J Frost; J M Parkin
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1985-05-18

6.  Benefits, risks and costs of immunization for measles, mumps and rubella.

Authors:  C C White; J P Koplan; W A Orenstein
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Vehicular carbon monoxide screening: identification in a cross-cultural setting of a substantial public health risk factor.

Authors:  R L Williams
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1985-01       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  Why we need to continue to immunize against mumps.

Authors:  R Gugelmann
Journal:  Soz Praventivmed       Date:  1995

9.  Persistence of rubella and mumps antibodies, following changes in the recommended age for the second dose of MMR vaccine in Portugal.

Authors:  G Gonçalves; J Frade; M S J Nascimento; J R Mesquita; C Nunes
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2016-08-04       Impact factor: 4.434

10.  An Economic Analysis of Mumps Vaccination in Fiji: Static Model Simulation of Routine Measles-Mumps-Rubella (MMR) Vaccination Instead of Current Measles-Rubella (MR) Vaccination.

Authors:  Chunghyeon Oh; Eric Rafai; Yinseo Cho; Damin Jun; Seungman Cha
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-02-07       Impact factor: 3.390

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.