Literature DB >> 6802369

General-practitioner obstetrics: two styles of care.

M P Roseveare, M J Bull.   

Abstract

Two systems of general-practitioner obstetric care currently in use in England are compared. In one (Oxford) a large number of doctors, working with community midwives, have autonomous responsibility for the management of patients whose condition conforms with defined booking criteria. In the other (Dulwich) two practitioners, working with hospital midwives, operate a minimal selection policy, but all their patients are reviewed at 36 weeks' gestation by a specialist obstetrician. Despite the differing selection policies which created incongruities in the groups in respect of age, social class, and birthweight distribution, the outcomes in terms of mode of delivery showed no significant differences. The perinatal mortality rates were also similar and appeared to be better than those achieved nationally.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 6802369      PMCID: PMC1496495          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.284.6320.958

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)        ISSN: 0267-0623


  5 in total

1.  Obstetric audit in general practice.

Authors:  G N Marsh
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1977-10-15

2.  The search for indices.

Authors:  I Chalmers
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1979-11-17       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Use by general practitioners of obstetric beds in a consultant unit: report of first 500 cases.

Authors:  K L Oldershaw; J M Brudenell
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1968-07-13

4.  Ten years' experience in a general practice obstetric unit.

Authors:  M J Bull
Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1980-04

5.  Use by general practitioners of obstetric beds in a consultant unit: a further report.

Authors:  K L Oldershaw; J M Brudenell
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1975-01-18
  5 in total
  5 in total

1.  Obstetrical practice and training in canadian family medicine: conserving an endangered species.

Authors:  M Klein; J L Reynolds; F Boucher; M Malus; E Rosenberg
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 3.275

2.  Intrapartum obstetrical consultation in a rural hospital.

Authors:  T K Bakshi
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 3.275

3.  Booking for maternity care. A comparison of two systems.

Authors:  M Klein; D Elbourne; I Lloyd
Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract Occas Pap       Date:  1985-04

4.  Obstetric anaesthetic services.

Authors: 
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1986-10-18

5.  Antenatal care in Belfast.

Authors:  A McKnight
Journal:  Ulster Med J       Date:  1987-10
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.