Literature DB >> 679941

Variable resistance versus constant resistance strength training in adult males.

T V Pipes.   

Abstract

Changes in strength, body composition and anthropometric measures for groups training with constant resistance and variable resistance training procedures was compared. Thirty-six male volunteers were randomly assigned to one of three groups: Constant Resistance (CR), Variable Resistance (VR) and Control (C). Strength training was conducted 3 days per week, 45 min per day, for 10 weeks. The results demonstrated that both the CR and the VR groups increased muscular strength. The CR group demonstrated significant increases in strength over the VR group when strength was assessed by CR procedures. Conversely, the VR group demonstrated significant increases in strength over the CR group when strength was assessed by VR procedures. Neither group exhibited superiority over the other relative to changes in body composition and anthropometric measures. The significance of these results is discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1978        PMID: 679941     DOI: 10.1007/BF00429676

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol        ISSN: 0301-5548


  7 in total

1.  COMPARISON OF THE EFFECT OF VARIOUS WEIGHT TRAINING LOADS ON STRENGTH.

Authors:  R A BERGER
Journal:  Res Q       Date:  1965-05

2.  Isokinetic vs isotonic strength training in adult men.

Authors:  T V Pipes; J H Wilmore
Journal:  Med Sci Sports       Date:  1975

3.  The effects of an anabolic steroid on the strength, body composition, and endurance of college males when accompanied by a weight training program.

Authors:  T D Fahey; C H Brown
Journal:  Med Sci Sports       Date:  1973

4.  Adaptations in strength and muscular endurance resulting from exercise.

Authors:  D H Clarke
Journal:  Exerc Sport Sci Rev       Date:  1973       Impact factor: 6.230

5.  A simplified method for determination of residual lung volumes.

Authors:  J H Wilmore
Journal:  J Appl Physiol       Date:  1969-07       Impact factor: 3.531

6.  An anthropometric estimation of body density and lean body weight in young men.

Authors:  J H Wilmore; A R Behnke
Journal:  J Appl Physiol       Date:  1969-07       Impact factor: 3.531

7.  Effects of selected weight training programs on the development of strength and muscle hypertrophy.

Authors:  P O'Shea
Journal:  Res Q       Date:  1966-03
  7 in total
  3 in total

Review 1.  A biomechanical evaluation of resistance: fundamental concepts for training and sports performance.

Authors:  David M Frost; John Cronin; Robert U Newton
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2010-04-01       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  The Effect of Resistance Training in Healthy Adults on Body Fat Percentage, Fat Mass and Visceral Fat: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Michael A Wewege; Imtiaz Desai; Cameron Honey; Brandon Coorie; Matthew D Jones; Briana K Clifford; Hayley B Leake; Amanda D Hagstrom
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2021-09-18       Impact factor: 11.136

3.  Variable resistance training promotes greater fatigue resistance but not hypertrophy versus constant resistance training.

Authors:  Simon Walker; Juha J Hulmi; Mathias Wernbom; Kai Nyman; William J Kraemer; Juha P Ahtiainen; Keijo Häkkinen
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 3.078

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.