Literature DB >> 6794874

Total body bone mineral and lean body mass by dual-photon absorptiometry. III. Comparison with trunk calcium by neutron activation analysis.

R B Mazess, W W Peppler, J E Harrison, K G McNeill.   

Abstract

Dual-photon absorptiometry using 153Gd (44 and 100 keV) was used to measure the bone mineral content (BMC) of the trunk and of the total body (TBBM) in 7 volunteers with no overt bone disease. These values were compared to those obtained with partial-body neutron activation of calcium (trunk Ca). The trunk Ca seemed to represent best a 60 x 30 cm area; the correlation coefficient with the corresponding BMC in that area was 0.97 (SEE congruent to 7%). Trunk Ca was also highly correlated with TBBM (r = 0.96; SEE = 8%) and with radius BMC (r = 0.92; SEE = 11%), but the correlations with the BMC of smaller subareas of the trunk were lower (r congruent to 0.9; SEE approximately 12%). The BMC of the lumbar spine was only moderately correlated with trunk Ca, radius BMC and TBBM (r approximately 0.82; SEE approximately 18%), and only slightly more associated with trunk BMC (r approximately 0.88; SEE approximately 14%). The BMC of the combined lumbar-thoracic spine showed higher correlations with trunk Ca, radius BMC and TBBM (r approximately 0.87; SEE approximately 13%), and trunk BMC (r = 0.93; SEE approximately 10%). An accurate and sensitive measure of spinal status requires a direct measurement of that area.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1981        PMID: 6794874     DOI: 10.1007/BF02409457

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int        ISSN: 0171-967X            Impact factor:   4.333


  17 in total

1.  Measurement of skeletal status by noninvasive methods.

Authors:  R B Mazess
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1979-10-31       Impact factor: 4.333

2.  Predicting radial bone mineral content in normal subjects.

Authors:  S H Cohn; K J Ellis
Journal:  Int J Nucl Med Biol       Date:  1975-03

3.  Densites of bones of white and Negro skeletons.

Authors:  M TROTTER; G E BROMAN; R R PETERSON
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1960-01       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Total body bone mineral by photon absorptiometry.

Authors:  R B Mazess; W Peppler
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Res       Date:  1977-05

5.  Direct readout of bone mineral content using radionuclide absorptiometry.

Authors:  R B Mazess; J R Cameron
Journal:  Int J Appl Radiat Isot       Date:  1972-10

6.  Vertebral and peripheral bone mineral content by photon absorptiometry.

Authors:  M Madsen
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  1977 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.016

7.  Dichromatic absorptiometry of vertebral bone mineral content.

Authors:  C R Wilson; M Madsen
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  1977 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.016

8.  Correlation of radial bone mineral content with total body calcium in chronic renal failure.

Authors:  S H Cohn; K J Ellis; R C Caselnova; S N Asad; J M Letteri
Journal:  J Lab Clin Med       Date:  1975-12

9.  Relationship between local and total bone mass in osteoporosis.

Authors:  E Manzke; C H Chesnut; J E Wergedal; D J Baylink; W B Nelp
Journal:  Metabolism       Date:  1975-05       Impact factor: 8.694

10.  Bone mineral measurements of the central skeleton by in vivo neutron activation analysis for routine investigation os osteopenia.

Authors:  J E Harrison; K G McNeill; A J Hitchman; B A Britt
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  1979 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 6.016

View more
  6 in total

1.  Total and regional bone mineral content in normal premenopausal women.

Authors:  H Rico; M Revilla; E R Hernandez; L F Villa; A Lopez-Alonso
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 2.980

2.  Bone mineral content by photon absorptiometry of the mandible compared with that of the forearm and the lumbar spine.

Authors:  N von Wowern; T L Storm; K Olgaard
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 4.333

3.  Total body and regional bone mineral by dual-photon absorptiometry in metabolic bone disease.

Authors:  R B Mazess; W W Peppler; R W Chesney; T A Lange; U Lindgren; E Smith
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 4.333

4.  Sex differences in the acquisition of total bone mineral mass peak assessed through dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.

Authors:  H Rico; M Revilla; E R Hernandez; L F Villa; M Alvarez del Buergo
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 4.333

5.  Is pelvic bone mineral content assessed through dual energy X-ray absorptiometry an appropriate anatomical area for bone mass estimation in women?

Authors:  H Rico; M Revilla; E R Hernández; L F Villa; M Alvarez del Buergo
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 2.980

Review 6.  Fracture prediction, imaging and screening in osteoporosis.

Authors:  Nicholas R Fuggle; Elizabeth M Curtis; Kate A Ward; Nicholas C Harvey; Elaine M Dennison; Cyrus Cooper
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 43.330

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.