Literature DB >> 6789625

Intraluminal pressure measurements during barium enema: full column vs. air contrast.

W C Diner, G Patel, E C Texter, M L Baker, J M Tune, M D Hightower.   

Abstract

Intraluminal pressure measurements were made during enema examination of 10 patients undergoing full column studies and 10 patients receiving air-contrast studies. There was no significant difference between the pressure in the distal colon of the two groups. All pressures were less than those produced by Valsalva maneuver or straight leg raising, and were generally less than those previously found to be necessary to rupture the colon. The authors believe that the findings should dispel any fear that an air-contrast examination is more hazardous than a full column study. Perforations occurring during these procedures are more likely related to disease of the colon wall or local trauma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1981        PMID: 6789625     DOI: 10.2214/ajr.137.2.217

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  3 in total

1.  Are hydrostatic and pneumatic methods of intussusception reduction comparable?

Authors:  M A Sargent; B P Wilson
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  1991

2.  Manometrically guided colon insufflation during double-contrast barium enemas.

Authors:  W F Short; G Moss; J C Crowther; R C Friedman; R L Horwitz; L G Manco; P R Silk
Journal:  Gastrointest Radiol       Date:  1985

3.  Appendiceal filling by double-contrast barium enema.

Authors:  J A Harding; S N Glick; S K Teplick; L Kowal
Journal:  Gastrointest Radiol       Date:  1986
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.