Literature DB >> 6788991

7,12-dimethylbenz[a]anthracene-induced DNA binding and repair synthesis in susceptible and nonsusceptible mammary epithelial cells in culture.

L K Tay, J Russo.   

Abstract

The effect of age and parity on the binding of 7,12-dimethybenz[a]anthracene (DMBA) to DNA and the repair of DMBA-damaged DNA have been demonstrated in logarithmic phase and confluent mammary epithelial cell cultures from young virgin (YV), old virgin (OV), and parous (P) noninbred and inbred Sprague-Dawley rats. Over a dose range of 0.1-0.4 micrograms DMBA/ml, DNA binding was 1.5-to 2.0-fold higher in YV cells than in OV or P cells. In addition, a steeper slope of the dose-response curve was obtained with YV cells, suggesting a greater susceptibility of YV cells to DMBA. Excision repair was determined by measuring, in the presence of hydroxyurea and 5-bromodeoxyuridine, tritiated thymidine incorporation into DNA during the repair process. At high doses od DMBA (0.5-2.0 micrograms/ml), excision repair in YV cells was 1.5 times higher than in OV cells and 2 times higher than in P cells. However, with lower DMBA doses (less than 0.5 micrograms/ml) similar levels of repair were obtained in all 3 groups of rats. Since binding to DNA is higher in YV cells at these low DMBA doses, ti is apparent that OV and P cells exhibit a greater DNA repair per unit damage. These results, therefore, suggest that age and parity not only lower the binding of DMBA to mammary epithelial cell DNA but also increase the efficiency of DNA repair processes, which may explain the lower susceptibility of OV and P rats to DMBA-induced mammary carcinogenesis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1981        PMID: 6788991

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst        ISSN: 0027-8874            Impact factor:   13.506


  11 in total

Review 1.  Significance of rat mammary tumors for human risk assessment.

Authors:  Jose Russo
Journal:  Toxicol Pathol       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 1.902

Review 2.  TGF-beta3 and cancer: a review.

Authors:  H G Laverty; L M Wakefield; N L Occleston; S O'Kane; M W J Ferguson
Journal:  Cytokine Growth Factor Rev       Date:  2009-08-04       Impact factor: 7.638

3.  Endocrinologic milieu and susceptibility of the rat mammary gland to carcinogenesis.

Authors:  D R Ciocca; A Parente; J Russo
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  1982-10       Impact factor: 4.307

4.  Susceptibility of the mammary gland to carcinogenesis. III. The cell of origin of rat mammary carcinoma.

Authors:  J Russo; L Tait; I H Russo
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  1983-10       Impact factor: 4.307

5.  Susceptibility of rats to mammary gland carcinogenesis by the food-derived carcinogen 2-amino-1-methyl-6-phenylimidazo[4,5-b]pyridine (PhIP) varies with age and is associated with the induction of differential gene expression.

Authors:  Liang Shan; Minshu Yu; Herman A J Schut; Elizabeth G Snyderwine
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 4.307

Review 6.  Differentiation of the mammary gland and susceptibility to carcinogenesis.

Authors:  J Russo; L K Tay; I H Russo
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 7.  Experimentally induced mammary tumors in rats.

Authors:  J Russo; I H Russo
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 8.  The protective role of pregnancy in breast cancer.

Authors:  Jose Russo; Raquel Moral; Gabriela A Balogh; Daniel Mailo; Irma H Russo
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2005-04-07       Impact factor: 6.466

Review 9.  Mammary gland neoplasia in long-term rodent studies.

Authors:  I H Russo; J Russo
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 10.  Molecular and cellular basis of the mammary gland susceptibility to carcinogenesis.

Authors:  J Russo; L K Tay; D R Ciocca; I H Russo
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 9.031

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.