Literature DB >> 678836

Screening for breast cancer. Report from Edinburgh Breast Screening Clinic.

.   

Abstract

As part of a trial to determine the feasibility of screening for breast cancer, 3952 women aged 40--59 years were screened once or more over two years. They represented 82% of those invited by a personal letter from their GPs. Each woman underwent mammography, two clinical examinations, and, usually, thermography. Further investigations included needle aspiration of cysts, xeromammography, and biopsy. Of the 125 women who underwent biopsy, 18 proved to have cancer. Because of the high response rate and consequent large sample of normal women the biopsy and cancer detection rates were low. Clinical examination and mammography together were more effective in detecting significant lesions than either procedure alone, and knowledge of the mammographic findings enabled the examiner to detect more abnormalities. Screening was expensive: each cancer detected cost about 6000 pounds, excluding data processing, surgical, and pathological costs. The clinic has now adopted a more simplified screening regimen, which should reduce costs, but more accurate imaging techniques and ways of identifying high-risk cases are needed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1978        PMID: 678836      PMCID: PMC1606227          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.2.6131.175

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br Med J        ISSN: 0007-1447


  6 in total

1.  Screening for breast cancer--a report of II 654 examinations.

Authors:  A Bailey; J Davey; H Pentney; A Tucker; H B Wright
Journal:  Clin Oncol       Date:  1976-12

2.  Breast screening and surgical problems.

Authors:  A W Owen; A P Forrest; T J Anderson; E Samuel; G B Young; A M Scott
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1977-10       Impact factor: 6.939

3.  "Superstaging" in breast cancer--a correlation of lymph node histology and investigations designed to detect occult metastatic disease.

Authors:  E L Cant; A F Smith; M D Sumerling; A P Forrest
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1977-05       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Evidence on screening for breast cancer from a randomized trial.

Authors:  S Shapiro
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1977-06       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Techniques and radiation in mammography.

Authors:  G B Young
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1974-11       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  Validity of clinical examination and mammography as screening tests for breast cancer.

Authors:  J Chamberlain; P Rogers; J L Price; S Ginks; B E Nathan; I Burn
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1975-11-22       Impact factor: 79.321

  6 in total
  1 in total

Review 1.  Screening for breast cancer with mammography.

Authors:  Peter C Gøtzsche; Karsten Juhl Jørgensen
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-06-04
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.