Literature DB >> 6787863

Resident film interpretations and staff review.

S E Seltzer, S J Hessel, P G Herman, R G Swensson, C R Sheriff.   

Abstract

In this department 22% of examinations are interpreted independently by residents outside of normal hours. Staff radiologists review these studies in a process designed to train residents and assure appropriate radiologic consultation. The resident's written reports on 2,619 examinations were analyzed before and after staff review. Each film review session lasted an average of 1.1 hr. Potential changes were discussed in 9.1% of cases and mandated in 6.3%. About two-thirds of corrections were important enough to influence patient care. Correction rates declined significantly between the first and second/third years of residency; the proportion of clinically important changes also decreased. Omissions (false-negatives) were much more common than overcalls (false-positives). Residents correctly interpreted 89% of abnormal films and 96% of normal radiographs. Staff review resulted in a net improvement in interpretation of 4% of cases initially read by first-year residents and 2% by second- and third-year. The film review process provides opportunities for close resident-staff interaction and teaching and also ensures appropriate final reports.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1981        PMID: 6787863     DOI: 10.2214/ajr.137.1.129

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  8 in total

1.  Quality control in neuroradiology: impact of trainees on discrepancy rates.

Authors:  V G Viertel; L S Babiarz; M Carone; J S Lewin; D M Yousem
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2012-02-02       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  First year radiology residents not taking call: will there be a difference?

Authors:  William M Strub; James L Leach; Jun Ying; Achala Vagal
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2007-01-25

3.  The misinterpretation rates of radiology residents on emergent neuroradiology magnetic resonance (MR) angiogram studies: correlation with level of residency training.

Authors:  Christopher G Filippi; Russell E Meyer; Keith Cauley; Joshua P Nickerson; Heather N Burbank; Jason M Johnson; Grant J Linnell; Gray F Alsofrom
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2009-06-05

4.  Radiology resident evaluation of head CT scan orders in the emergency department.

Authors:  William K Erly; William G Berger; Elizabeth Krupinski; Joachim F Seeger; John A Guisto
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.825

5.  Spectrum and detection of musculoskeletal findings on trauma-related CT torso examinations.

Authors:  Justin W Kung; Jim S Wu; Sanjay K Shetty; Vhaibhav C Khasgiwala; Paul Appleton; Mary G Hochman
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2014-02-21

6.  Should all casualty radiographs be reviewed?

Authors:  J Wardrope; P M Chennells
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1985-06-01

7.  Interobserver Agreement between On-Call Radiology Resident and General Radiologist Interpretations of CT Pulmonary Angiograms and CT Venograms.

Authors:  Bahar Tamjeedi; José Correa; Alexandre Semionov; Benoît Mesurolle
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-04       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Interpretations of diffusion-weighted MR imaging by radiology residents in the emergency department: is diagnostic performance influenced by the level of residency training?

Authors:  Sungjae Lee; Hye Jin Baek; Hyun Kyung Jung; Jin Il Moon; Soo Buem Cho; Bo Hwa Choi; Kyungsoo Bae; Kyung Nyeo Jeon; Dae Seob Choi; Hwa Seon Shin; Dong Wook Kim
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 3.469

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.