Literature DB >> 6786457

Five year follow-up of effects of treatment of mild and moderate hypertension.

J A Trafford, C R Horn, H O'Neal, R McGonigle, L Halford-Maw, R Evans.   

Abstract

A five-year follow-up study of the effects of treating patients with both mild and moderate hypertension was performed. The patients were identified during a hospital-based community survey of hypertension. A total of 961 patients were divided into four groups. The first group, the controls, were age- and sex-matched normotensive subjects selected sequentially from the same survey. The second group were patients defined as well-controlled hypertensives; the third group were patients whose blood pressures were less well-controlled; and the fourth group consisted of patients who, for various reasons, were not treated and as such acted as an untreated control group. Both mortality and morbidity were considerably greater in the untreated patients than in the normal subjects. The well-controlled hypertensive patients showed no difference in either morbidity or mortality from normal subjects. The less well-controlled patients had a significantly greater cardiovascular morbidity but no excess mortality over groups 1 and 2. This was true for both mild and moderate hypertension and for women as well as men. These findings therefore confirm the conclusions of other recent studies that good control of hypertension at all levels and in both sexes is justified by the reduction in morbidity and that even less than excellent control is of considerable benefit.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1981        PMID: 6786457      PMCID: PMC1505057          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.282.6270.1111

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)        ISSN: 0267-0623


  4 in total

1.  THE ROLE OF BLOOD-PRESSURE CONTROL IN PREVENTING COMPLICATIONS OF HYPERTENSION.

Authors:  M HAMILTON; E M THOMPSON; T K WISNIEWSKI
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1964-02-01       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Treatment of mild hypertension: results of a ten-year intervention trial.

Authors:  W M Smith
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  1977-05       Impact factor: 17.367

3.  Screening for hypertension: a hospital-based home-vising programme.

Authors:  J A Trafford; R Ireland; R McGonigle; P Sharpstone; L Halford-Maw; R Evans
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1979-12-15

4.  Coronary heart-disease after treatment of hypertension.

Authors:  G Berglund; R Sannerstedt; O Andersson; H Wedel; L Wilhelmsen; L Hansson; R Sivertsson; J Wikstrand
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1978-01-07       Impact factor: 79.321

  4 in total
  4 in total

Review 1.  According to MIAMI and ISIS-I trials, can a general recommendation be given for beta blockers in acute myocardial infarction?

Authors:  J K Kjekshus
Journal:  Cardiovasc Drugs Ther       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 3.727

2.  A case of moderate hypertension: diagnosis, management and consideration of family factors.

Authors:  D B Shires; C Abbott; R MacLachlan; D Curtis; D Myhre; L Muzzerall
Journal:  Can Med Assoc J       Date:  1983-03-01       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Prognosis of treated hypertension 1951-1981.

Authors:  C J Bulpitt
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 4.335

4.  Increased platelet adhesion and aggregation in hypertensive patients: effect of atenolol.

Authors:  A Markel; J G Brook; Y Levy; M Aviram; M B Youdim
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1983-12       Impact factor: 4.335

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.