Literature DB >> 6785478

Comparison of continuous vs intermittent tube feedings in adult burn patients.

J M Hiebert, A Brown, R G Anderson, S Halfacre, G T Rodeheaver, R F Edlich.   

Abstract

In an effort to determine an optimal method of utilizing the gastrointestinal tract to meet the nutritional need of burn patients, a comparison was made between continuous and intermittent delivery of lactose-free tube-fed diets in similar groups of burn-injured patients. It was found that significantly less stool frequency and time required to achieve the nutritional goal occurred in patients treated with continuous pump tube feeding over those fed intermittently.

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  1981        PMID： 6785478     DOI： 10.1177/014860718100500173

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr        ISSN： 0148-6071            Impact factor:   4.016


  16 in total

1.  Clinical application of clip-assisted endoscopic method for nasoenteric feeding in patients with gastroparesis and gastroesophageal wounds.

Authors:  Chung-Jen Wu; Ping-I Hsu; Gin-Ho Lo; Chang-Bih Shie; Ching-Chu Lo; E-Ming Wang; Chiun-Ku Lin; Wen-Chi Chen; Lung-Chih Cheng; Hsien-Chung Yu; Yi-Chun Chan; Kwok-Hung Lai
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2005-06-28       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Colonic responses to enteral tube feeding.

Authors:  T E Bowling; D B Silk
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 3.  Enteral feeding: techniques of administration.

Authors:  B J Jones
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 4.  Indications for tube feedings in elderly patients.

Authors:  J O Ciocon
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 3.438

5.  Effect of different feeding methods on gastrointestinal function in critical patients (DFM-GFC): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Guang Yang; Aijing Deng; Bojun Zheng; Jian Li; Yi Yu; Honglian Ouyang; Xin Huang; Hong Chen
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2022-10-20       Impact factor: 2.728

Review 6.  Nutritional support of the burned patient.

Authors:  J P Waymack; D N Herndon
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1992 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 7.  Time-restricted feeding and the realignment of biological rhythms: translational opportunities and challenges.

Authors:  Jag Sunderram; Stavroula Sofou; Kubra Kamisoglu; Vassiliki Karantza; Ioannis P Androulakis
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2014-03-28       Impact factor: 5.531

8.  Effects of Bolus and Continuous Nasogastric Feeding on Gastric Emptying, Small Bowel Water Content, Superior Mesenteric Artery Blood Flow, and Plasma Hormone Concentrations in Healthy Adults: A Randomized Crossover Study.

Authors:  Abeed H Chowdhury; Kathryn Murray; Caroline L Hoad; Carolyn Costigan; Luca Marciani; Ian A Macdonald; Timothy E Bowling; Dileep N Lobo
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Continuous versus bolus tube feeds: Does the modality affect glycemic variability, tube feeding volume, caloric intake, or insulin utilization?

Authors:  David C Evans; Rachel Forbes; Christian Jones; Robert Cotterman; Chinedu Njoku; Cattleya Thongrong; David Tulman; Sergio D Bergese; Sheela Thomas; Thomas J Papadimos; Stanislaw P Stawicki
Journal:  Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci       Date:  2016 Jan-Mar

10.  Comparison of Intermittent and Bolus Enteral Feeding Methods on Enteral Feeding Intolerance of Patients with Sepsis: A Triple-blind Controlled Trial in Intensive Care Units.

Authors:  Morteza Nasiri; Zahra Farsi; Mojtaba Ahangari; Fahimeh Dadgari
Journal:  Middle East J Dig Dis       Date:  2017-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.