Literature DB >> 6783027

Foraging strategies of Drosophila melanogaster: a chromosomal analysis.

M B Sokolowski.   

Abstract

Two larval foraging strategies in Drosophila melanogaster were identified, "rover" and "sitter." "Rovers" traverse a large area while feeding whereas "sitters" cover a small area. The difference between "rovers" and "sitters" was analyzed genetically by chromosomal substitutions between isogenic stocks. Differences in larval locomotor behavior ("crawling behavior") can be attributed to the second chromosome, the "rover" strategy being dominant over the "sitter" strategy. Differences in feeding rate ("shoveling behavior") are affected additively by both the second and third chromosomes. Natural populations of Drosophila larvae were sampled three times over a 2-month period; "rovers" and "sitters" were at constant frequencies in these populations. The two foraging strategies are discussed in the light of resource utilization in environments where food is distributed continuously or discontinuously.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1980        PMID: 6783027     DOI: 10.1007/BF01067774

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Genet        ISSN: 0001-8244            Impact factor:   2.805


  10 in total

1.  Relationship between larval feeding behavior and viability in Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans.

Authors:  S Ohnishi
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  1979-03       Impact factor: 2.805

2.  FACTORS RESPONSIBLE FOR A CHANGE IN INTERSPECIFIC COMPETITIVE ABILITY IN DROSOPHILA.

Authors:  Philip W Hedrick
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1972-12       Impact factor: 3.694

Review 3.  Genes, behavior, and evolutionary processes: the genus Drosophila.

Authors:  P A Parsons
Journal:  Adv Genet       Date:  1977       Impact factor: 1.944

4.  Biogenic amines in Drosophila melanogaster selected for differences in larval feeding behavior.

Authors:  D F Sewell; D M Hunt; B Burnet
Journal:  Behav Biol       Date:  1975-10

5.  Activity and sexual behavior of neurological mutants in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  B Burnet; K Connolly; M Mallinson
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  1974-09       Impact factor: 2.805

6.  Habitat selection and evolutionary strategies in Drosophila: an invited address.

Authors:  P A Parsons
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  1978-11       Impact factor: 2.805

7.  A stablizing interaction between the founder effect and interdeme mixing in competing populations of Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans.

Authors:  D L Gibo
Journal:  Can J Zool       Date:  1972-03       Impact factor: 1.597

8.  Locomotor activity in drosophila. II. Selection for active and inactive strains.

Authors:  K Connolly
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1966-10       Impact factor: 2.844

9.  The comparative evolutionary biology of the sibling species, Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans.

Authors:  P A Parsons
Journal:  Q Rev Biol       Date:  1975-06       Impact factor: 4.875

10.  Inter- and intrapopulational variation in digging in Drosophila melanagaster larvae.

Authors:  R Godoy-Herrera
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  1977-11       Impact factor: 2.805

  10 in total
  81 in total

1.  Abnormal turning behavior in Drosophila larvae. Identification and molecular analysis of scribbler (sbb).

Authors:  P Yang; S A Shaver; A J Hilliker; M B Sokolowski
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Nonadditive indirect effects of group genetic diversity on larval viability in Drosophila melanogaster imply key role of maternal decision-making.

Authors:  Julia B Saltz; Evan T Alicuben; Jessica Grubman; Matthew Harkenrider; Nichelle Megowan; Sergey V Nuzhdin
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 6.185

Review 3.  Genetic contributions to behavioural diversity at the gene-environment interface.

Authors:  Andres Bendesky; Cornelia I Bargmann
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2011-11-08       Impact factor: 53.242

Review 4.  Phenomics: the next challenge.

Authors:  David Houle; Diddahally R Govindaraju; Stig Omholt
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 53.242

Review 5.  Behaviour genetics of Drosophila: non-sexual behaviour.

Authors:  Seema Sisodia; B N Singh
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 1.166

6.  Evolution of foraging behavior in Drosophila by density-dependent selection.

Authors:  M B Sokolowski; H S Pereira; K Hughes
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-07-08       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Natural variation in Drosophila larval reward learning and memory due to a cGMP-dependent protein kinase.

Authors:  Karla R Kaun; Thomas Hendel; Bertram Gerber; Marla B Sokolowski
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2007-05-03       Impact factor: 2.460

8.  Memory flies sooner from flies that learn faster.

Authors:  Daniel R Papaj; Emilie C Snell-Rood
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-08-15       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Genetic basis for remating in Drosophila melanogaster. V. Biometrical and planned comparisons analyses.

Authors:  H H Fukui; M H Gromko
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 2.805

10.  The adult foraging assay (AFA) detects strain and food-deprivation effects in feeding-related traits of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Bryon N Hughson; Ina Anreiter; Nicholas L Jackson Chornenki; Keith R Murphy; William W Ja; Robert Huber; Marla B Sokolowski
Journal:  J Insect Physiol       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 2.354

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.