Literature DB >> 6782602

Effects of scopolamine, pilocarpine, and oxotremorine on the exploratory behavior of two psychogenetically selected lines of rats in a complex maze.

J R Martin, D H Overstreet, P Driscoll, K Bättig.   

Abstract

Rats of two psychogenetically selected lines received pretest IP injections of scopolamine hydrobromide (0.25, 1.0, or 4.0 mg/kg), pilocarpine hydrochloride (3.0, 6.0, or 12.0 mg/kg) or oxotremorine sesquifumarate (0.2, 0.4 or 0.8 mg/kg) and were subsequently placed in a complex enclosed maze of the Dashiell type that included a small, central, illuminated arena. Animals receiving pilocarpine or oxotremorine injections were pretreated with methscopolamine to counter the peripheral actions of these muscarinic cholinergic agonists. Following vehicle injections, Roman High-Avoidance rats (RHA/Verh) were significantly more active, explored more maze sectors, and required less time to activate the initial 24 different photocell units uniformly distributed throughout the maze than Roman Low-Avoidance rats (RLA/Verh). Scopolamine, pilocarpine, and oxotremorine depressed locomotor activity, reduced the explored area, and increased the time required to activate the initial 24 different photocell units within this complex maze for both RHA/Verh and RLA/Verh rats. Although the doses of scopolamine injected were approximately equally effective in both rat lines (except for total maze activity), the RHA/Verh rats exhibited significant alterations in several measures of maze patrolling after treatment with the lowest dose of pilocarpine, whereas the RLA/Verh rats did not. In contrast, most of the RLA/Verh rats exhibited very pronounced tremors following treatment with the highest dose of oxotremorine, but none of the RHA/Verh rats did. These results demonstrate that manipulation of the central cholinergic system with scopolamine, pilocarpine, or oxotremorine, despite their different pharmacological mechanisms, impair maze patrolling. Furthermore, the results suggest that the two psychogenetically bred lines of rats investigated are differentially sensitive to central cholinergic manipulation with the muscarinic receptor agonists pilocarpine and oxotremorine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1981        PMID: 6782602     DOI: 10.1007/BF00431646

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)        ISSN: 0033-3158            Impact factor:   4.530


  32 in total

1.  EFFECTS OF ATROPINE ON DISCRIMINATION LEARNING IN THE RAT.

Authors:  J M WHITEHOUSE
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1964-02

2.  Brain acetylcholine concentration and acetylcholinesterase activity in selectively-bred strains of rats.

Authors:  D A Buxton; R W Brimblecombe; M C French; P H Redfern
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1976-05-05       Impact factor: 4.530

3.  Genotype-dependent effects of scopolamine and eserine on exploratory behaviour in mice.

Authors:  J H van Abeelen; H Strijbosch
Journal:  Psychopharmacologia       Date:  1969

4.  Selection for two-way avoidance deficit inhibits shock-induced fighting in the rat.

Authors:  P Driscoll; P Woodson; H Fuemm; K Baettig
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1980-04

Review 5.  Nonassociative explanations of behavioral changes induced by central cholinergic drugs.

Authors:  G Bignami
Journal:  Acta Neurobiol Exp (Wars)       Date:  1976       Impact factor: 1.579

6.  Selective loss of central cholinergic neurons in Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  P Davies; A J Maloney
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1976-12-25       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Modification of eating and drinking: interactions between chemical agent, deprivation state, and site of stimulation.

Authors:  R R Hutchinson; J W Renfrew
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1967-06

8.  Scopolamine interacts with reactions to cat and genotypic emotional reactivity in rat.

Authors:  K P Satinder; P M Valliant
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  1978-10       Impact factor: 3.533

9.  Effect of scopolamine on maze learning performance in humans.

Authors:  D D Rasmusson; J D Dudar
Journal:  Experientia       Date:  1979-08-15

10.  Memory and cognitive function in man: does the cholinergic system have a specific role?

Authors:  D A Drachman
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1977-08       Impact factor: 9.910

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Genetic determinants of individual differences in avoidance learning: behavioral and endocrine characteristics.

Authors:  F R Brush
Journal:  Experientia       Date:  1991-10-15

2.  Genetic and environmental influences on reactive and spontaneous locomotor activities in rats.

Authors:  C Gentsch; M Lichtsteiner; H Feer
Journal:  Experientia       Date:  1991-10-15

Review 3.  Genetic and pharmacological models of cholinergic supersensitivity and affective disorders.

Authors:  D H Overstreet; R W Russell; A D Crocker; J C Gillin; D S Janowsky
Journal:  Experientia       Date:  1988-06-15

4.  The current status of two sublines of the Roman High and Low Avoidance strains.

Authors:  M J Durcan; K B Wraight; D W Fulker
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 2.805

5.  Genetic and histological aspects of stomach lesions induced by systemic injection of phenylbutazone in the rat.

Authors:  P Driscoll; P Kugler
Journal:  Experientia       Date:  1984-09-15

6.  Differential response to cholinergic stimulation in psychogenitically selected rat lines.

Authors:  J R Martin; P Driscoll; C Gentsch
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 4.530

7.  Effects of chlordiazepoxide and imipramine on maze patrolling within two different maze configurations by psychogenetically selected lines of rats.

Authors:  J R Martin; R Oettinger; P Driscoll; R Buzzi; K Bättig
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 4.530

8.  Selective breeding for diisopropyl fluorophosphate-sensitivity: behavioural effects of cholinergic agonists and antagonists.

Authors:  D H Overstreet; R W Russell
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 4.530

9.  Brain muscarinic cholinergic receptor binding in Roman high- and low-avoidance rats.

Authors:  D H Overstreet; P Driscoll; J R Martin; H I Yamamura
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 4.530

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.