Literature DB >> 6773564

Carotenoid triplet yields in normal and deuterated Rhodospirillum rubrum.

H Rademaker, A J Hoff, R van Grondelle, L N Duysens.   

Abstract

Quantum yields of carotenoid triplet formation in Rhodospirillum rubrum wild type and fully deuterated cells and chromatophores were determined in weak laser flashes for excitation wavelength lambda i = 530 nm (mainly absorbed by the carotenoid spirilloxanthin) and for lambda i = 608 nm (mainly absorbed by bacteriochlorophyll) in the presence and absence of magnetic fields. All experiments were performed at room temperature and in the absence of oxygen. The quantum yield of reaction center bacteriochlorophyll oxidation in wild type preparations, in which all reaction centers are in state PIX, at lambda i = 608 nm is close to unity, whereas the quantum yield of antenna carotenoid triplet formation is low (about 5%); P is the primary electron donor, a bacteriochlorophyll dimer, I the primary acceptor, a bacteriopheophytin, and X the secondary acceptor, an iron-ubiquinone complex. In cells in which the reaction centers are in the state P+IX(-), the antenna carotenoid triplet yield is about 0.2. In contrast, at lambda i = 530 nm, the quantum yield of P+ formation is relatively low (0.3) and the yield of the antenna carotenoid triplet state in state PIX unusually high (0.3). At increasing light intensities of 530 nm only about 3 carotenoids per reaction center of the 15 carotenoids present are efficiently photoconverted into the triplet state, which indicates that there are two different pools of carotenoids, one with a low efficiency for transfer of electronic excitation to bacteriochlorophyll and a high yield for triplet formation, the other with a high transfer efficiency and a low triplet yield. The absorption difference spectrum of the antenna carotenoid triplet, excited by 608 or 530 nm light in the state P+IX(-) does not show the peak at 430 nm, that is present in the difference spectrum of the reaction center carotenoid triplet, mainly observed at lambda i = 608 nm with weak flashes. The yield of the reaction center carotenoid triplet, generated in chromatophores in the state PIX(-), is decreased by about 10% by a magnetic field of 0.6 T. In a magnetic field of 0.6 T the yield of the carotenoid triplet, formed by 530 nm excitation in chromatophores at ambient redox potential, is decreased by about 45%. The high quantum yield of formation and the pronounced magnetic field effect for the carotenoid triplet generated by direct excitation at 530 nm can be explained by assuming that this triplet is not formed by intersystem crossing, but by fission of the singlet excitation into two triplet excitations and subsequent annihilation (triplet pair mechanism), or by charge separation and subsequent recombination (radical pair mechanism). Fully deuterated bacteria give essentially the same triplet yields, both in the reaction center and in the antenna carotenoids and show the same magnetic field effects as non-deuterated samples. This indicates that hyperfine interactions do not play a major role in the dephasing of the spins in the radical pair P+I- nor in the formation of the antenna carotenoid triplet.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1980        PMID: 6773564     DOI: 10.1016/0005-2728(80)90185-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta        ISSN: 0006-3002


  14 in total

1.  Vibrational spectroscopy of excited electronic states in carotenoids in vivo. Picosecond time-resolved resonance Raman scattering.

Authors:  H Hayashi; T Noguchi; M Tasumi; G H Atkinson
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Antenna organization in purple bacteria investigated by means of fluorescence induction curves.

Authors:  H W Trissl
Journal:  Photosynth Res       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Excitation energy transfer from the bacteriochlorophyll Soret band to carotenoids in the LH2 light-harvesting complex from Ectothiorhodospira haloalkaliphila is negligible.

Authors:  A P Razjivin; E P Lukashev; V O Kompanets; V S Kozlovsky; A A Ashikhmin; S V Chekalin; A A Moskalenko; V Z Paschenko
Journal:  Photosynth Res       Date:  2017-02-16       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Carotenoids and bacterial photosynthesis: The story so far...

Authors:  N J Fraser; H Hashimoto; R J Cogdell
Journal:  Photosynth Res       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  Singlet-triplet Fission of Carotenoid Excitation in the Purple Phototrophic Bacteria Thermochromatium tepidum.

Authors:  I B Klenina; A A Gryaznov; Z K Makhneva; I I Proskuryakov
Journal:  Dokl Biochem Biophys       Date:  2019-06-14       Impact factor: 0.788

6.  The balance between primary forward and back reactions in bacterial photosynthesis.

Authors:  H Rademaker; A J Hoff
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1981-05       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  An unusual pathway of excitation energy deactivation in carotenoids: singlet-to-triplet conversion on an ultrafast timescale in a photosynthetic antenna.

Authors:  C C Gradinaru; J T Kennis; E Papagiannakis; I H van Stokkum; R J Cogdell; G R Fleming; R A Niederman; R van Grondelle
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-02-20       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Magnetic field-induced increase in chlorophyll a delayed fluorescence of photosystem II: A 100- to 200-ns component between 4.2 and 300 K.

Authors:  A Sonneveld; L N Duysens; A Moerdijk
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1980-10       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Probing binding site of bacteriochlorophyll a and carotenoid in the reconstituted LH1 complex from Rhodospirillum rubrum S1 by Stark spectroscopy.

Authors:  Katsunori Nakagawa; Satoru Suzuki; Ritsuko Fujii; Alastair T Gardiner; Richard J Cogdell; Mamoru Nango; Hideki Hashimoto
Journal:  Photosynth Res       Date:  2007-10-03       Impact factor: 3.573

10.  Photoprotection in a purple phototrophic bacterium mediated by oxygen-dependent alteration of carotenoid excited-state properties.

Authors:  Václav Šlouf; Pavel Chábera; John D Olsen; Elizabeth C Martin; Pu Qian; C Neil Hunter; Tomáš Polívka
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-05-14       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.