Literature DB >> 677256

Visual acuity at different retinal loci of eccentrically fixating functional amblyopes.

D G Kirschen, M C Flom.   

Abstract

Visual acuity was measured in eccentrically fixating amblyopic subjects to determine the contribution of sensory (inhibitory) and motor (retinal-locus) components of the acuity loss. A unique aspect of this research involved the subjects' use of auditory feedback to control their unsteady and eccentric fixation while responding to flashed (800 msec) or continuously presented targets at various eccentricities in the visual field. All 4 amblyopic eyes had maximum visual acuity at the fovea; from there, the acuity declined approximately symmetrically into the nasal and temporal periphery. Foveal acuity for these amblyopic eyes was depressed from the acuity at the fovea of the normal eye. We conclude that Worth's explanation of eccentric fixation (eccentric fixation develops in an attempt by the amblyopic eye to fixate with a peripheral retinal locus having higher acuity than the fovea) cannot apply to our amblyopes. The acuity losses exhibited by the amblyopic eyes studied have a sensory (inhibition) component and a motor (retinal-locus) component, the sensory component being greater for small degrees of eccentric fixation and the motor component being greater for large amounts of eccentric fixation.

Mesh:

Year:  1978        PMID: 677256     DOI: 10.1097/00006324-197803000-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Optom Physiol Opt        ISSN: 0093-7002


  11 in total

1.  Pattern visual evoked potentials in the assessment of objective visual acuity in amblyopic children.

Authors:  Fatih C Gundogan; Fatih M Mutlu; H Ibrahim Altinsoy; Ahmet Tas; Oguzhan Oz; Gungor Sobaci
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-04-08       Impact factor: 2.031

2.  Multifocal VEP difference between early- and late-onset strabismus amblyopia.

Authors:  Wei Zhang; Kanxing Zhao
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2005 Mar-May       Impact factor: 2.379

3.  Monocular fixation with the optic nerve head: a case report.

Authors:  Fuensanta A Vera-Diaz; Eli Peli
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  Central and peripheral contrast sensitivity in amblyopia with varying field size.

Authors:  L M Katz; D M Levi; H E Bedell
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1984-12-15       Impact factor: 2.379

5.  Increased drift in amblyopic eyes.

Authors:  K J Ciuffreda; R V Kenyon; L Stark
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1980-01       Impact factor: 4.638

6.  Multifocal visual evoked potentials in amblyopia due to anisometropia.

Authors:  M M Moschos; I Margetis; S Tsapakis; G Panagakis; I K Chatzistephanou; E Iliakis
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-08-09

7.  The shift in X/Y ratio after chronic monocular paralysis: a binocularly mediated, barbiturate-sensitive effect in the adult lateral geniculate nucleus.

Authors:  P E Garraghty; W L Salinger; M G MacAvoy; C E Schroeder; W Guido
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Binocular Summation and Suppression of Contrast Sensitivity in Strabismus, Fusion and Amblyopia.

Authors:  Michael Dorr; MiYoung Kwon; Luis Andres Lesmes; Alexandra Miller; Melanie Kazlas; Kimberley Chan; David G Hunter; Zhong-Lin Lu; Peter J Bex
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2019-07-12       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Portable rotating grating stimulation for anisometropic amblyopia with 6 months training.

Authors:  Wen-Hsiu Yeh; Li-Ju Lai; Da-Wei Chang; Wei-Sin Lin; Guan-Ming Lin; Fu-Zen Shaw
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Assessing amblyopia treatment using multifocal visual evoked potentials.

Authors:  Junwon Jang; Sungeun E Kyung
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-08-13       Impact factor: 2.209

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.