Literature DB >> 6770407

Conditions under which chlordiazepoxide influences gustatory contrast.

C F Flaherty, B R Lombardi, J Wrightson, D Deptula.   

Abstract

Rats shifted from 32% sucrose to 4% sucrose consumed less 4% than animals without prior experience with 32% sucrose. The influence of chlordiazepoxide (CDP) on this successive negative contrast obtained in sucrose ingestion was investigated in four experiments. The results indicated that (1) rats injected with CDP during both preshift experience with 32% sucrose and post-shift experience with 4% sucrose showed an essentially unchanged contrast effect compared with saline-injected rats, (2) CDP injection for the first time on post-shift day 2 eliminated contrast but post-shift day 1 injections had little effect, (3) animals injected with CDP throughout preshift and switched to saline coincident with the sucrose shift showed a contrast effect at least as great as control animals, and (4) injections of CDP tended to elevate lick rate regardless of other conditions. These results indicate a disinhibitory effect of CDP and possible neophobia operating on the first post-shift day.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1980        PMID: 6770407     DOI: 10.1007/bf00431269

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)        ISSN: 0033-3158            Impact factor:   4.530


  16 in total

1.  Effects of scopolamine, physostigmine and chlordiazepoxide on punished and extinguished water consumption in rats.

Authors:  K A Miczek; P Lau
Journal:  Psychopharmacologia       Date:  1975-06-19

2.  Some relations between the intensive properties of the consummatory response and reinforcement.

Authors:  G COLLIER; F A KNARR; M H MARX
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1961-11

3.  Negative and positive behavioural contrast in the same animals.

Authors:  V Baltzer; L Weiskrantz
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1970-11-07       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Incentive contrast undiminished by extended testing, imipramine, or chlordiazepoxide.

Authors:  C F Flaherty; B R Lombardi; J Kapust; M R d'Amato
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  1977-10       Impact factor: 3.533

Review 5.  Retention of reinforcer magnitude.

Authors:  N E Spear
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1967-05       Impact factor: 8.934

6.  Effects of drug-state changes upon black-white discrimination learning in rats.

Authors:  S Iwahara; K Matsushita
Journal:  Psychopharmacologia       Date:  1971

7.  Effects of chlordiazepoxide on the acquisition of avoidance learning and its transfer to the normal state and other drug conditions.

Authors:  E Sachs; M Weingarten; N W Klein
Journal:  Psychopharmacologia       Date:  1966

8.  State-dependent learning produced by depressant and atropine-like drugs.

Authors:  D A Overton
Journal:  Psychopharmacologia       Date:  1966

9.  Effects of 9 -tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and chlordiazepoxide (CDP) on state-dependent learning: evidence for asymmetrical dissociation.

Authors:  M E Goldberg; M A Hefner; R C Robichaud; B Dubinsky
Journal:  Psychopharmacologia       Date:  1973-05-21

10.  Some effects of chlordiazepoxide and d-amphetamine on response force during punished responding in rats.

Authors:  S C Fowler; A W Price
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1978-03-01       Impact factor: 4.530

View more
  9 in total

1.  The effects of morphine in the consummatory contrast paradigm.

Authors:  G A Rowan; C F Flaherty
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  Lewis rats are more sensitive than Fischer rats to successive negative contrast, but less sensitive to the anxiolytic and appetite-stimulating effects of chlordiazepoxide.

Authors:  Christopher S Freet; Jason D Tesche; Dennie M Tompers; Katherine E Riegel; Patricia S Grigson
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  2006-10-16       Impact factor: 3.533

3.  Amobarbital sodium reduces successive gustatory contrast.

Authors:  C F Flaherty; C D Driscoll
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  Influence of ethanol on contrast in consummatory behavior.

Authors:  H C Becker; C F Flaherty
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 4.530

5.  Differential involvement of anxiety and novelty preference levels on oral ethanol consumption in rats.

Authors:  Yann Pelloux; Jean Costentin; Dominique Duterte-Boucher
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2015-03-13       Impact factor: 4.530

6.  Effects of nicotine and a cannabinoid receptor agonist on negative contrast: distinction between anxiety and disappointment?

Authors:  Rachel F Genn; S Tucci; S Parikh; S E File
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2004-06-16       Impact factor: 4.530

7.  Chlordiazepoxide and ethanol additively reduce gustatory negative contrast.

Authors:  H C Becker; C F Flaherty
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 4.530

8.  An easy-to-hard effect after nonreinforced preexposure in a sweetness discrimination.

Authors:  María Del Carmen Sanjuán; James Byron Nelson; Gumersinda Alonso
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 1.926

9.  Psychopharmacological characterisation of the successive negative contrast effect in rats.

Authors:  C E Phelps; E N Mitchell; D J Nutt; H M Marston; E S J Robinson
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2015-03-21       Impact factor: 4.530

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.