Literature DB >> 6770283

Statistical methods for determining prognosis in severe head injury.

D M Stablein, J D Miller, S C Choi, D P Becker.   

Abstract

Determining the prognostic significance of clinical factors for patients with severe head injury can lead to an improved understanding of the pathophysiology of head injury and to improvement in therapy. A technique known as the sequential Bayes method has been used previously for the purpose of prognosis. The application of this method assumes that prognostic factors are statistically independent. It is now known that they are not. Violation of the assumption of independence may produce errors in determining prognosis. As an alternative technique for predicting the outcome of patients with severe head injury, a logistic regression model is proposed. A preliminary evaluation of the method using data from 115 patients with head injury shows the feasibility of using early data to predict outcome accurately and of being able to rank input variables in order of their prognostc significance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1980        PMID: 6770283

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurgery        ISSN: 0148-396X            Impact factor:   4.654


  9 in total

1.  The Glasgow-Liège Scale. Prognostic value and evolution of motor response and brain stem reflexes after severe head injury.

Authors:  J D Born
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 2.216

2.  Classifications of coma.

Authors:  M Bozza Marrubini
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  Derivation of a bioclinical prognostic index in severe head injury.

Authors:  P Hans; A Albert; J D Born; J P Chapelle
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  A model based description of a head injury treatment.

Authors:  A M Black; R I Harris; J A Judson
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 2.216

5.  Late post-concussional symptoms in traumatic head injury. An analysis of frequency and risk factors.

Authors:  T H Edna; J Cappelen
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 2.216

6.  Predicting survival using simple clinical variables: a case study in traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  D F Signorini; P J Andrews; P A Jones; J M Wardlaw; J D Miller
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 10.154

7.  Review of 1,000 consecutive cases of severe head injury treated before the advent of CT scanning.

Authors:  S Turazzi; A Bricolo; M L Pasut
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 2.216

8.  Case mix, outcomes and comparison of risk prediction models for admissions to adult, general and specialist critical care units for head injury: a secondary analysis of the ICNARC Case Mix Programme Database.

Authors:  Jonathan A Hyam; Catherine A Welch; David A Harrison; David K Menon
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 9.097

9.  Pediatric Head Injury: A Study of 403 Cases in a Tertiary Care Hospital in a Developing Country.

Authors:  Abrar Ahad Wani; Arif Hussain Sarmast; Muzaffar Ahangar; Nayil Khursheed Malik; Sarabjit Singh Chhibber; Sajad Hussain Arif; Altaf Umar Ramzan; Bashir Ahmed Dar; Zulfiqar Ali
Journal:  J Pediatr Neurosci       Date:  2017 Oct-Dec
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.