| Literature DB >> 6762946 |
.
Abstract
Informed, healthy, volunteering women seeking interval sterilization were randomly allocated either to culdoscopy or to minilaparotomy. Data concerning the operation and follow-up to six weeks post-operation were analyzed for 199 women in the culdoscopy group and 196 in the minilaparotomy group. Major complications, both at operation and subsequently, occurred only in the vaginal procedure group (3%). Minor complications occurred in 3.6% of women in the minilaparotomy group, the majority of these involving the abdominal wound. In the women operated vaginally, minor complications occurred in 1.5%. Failure to perform the intended procedure on the fallopian tubes occurred in 10.6% of culdoscopy cases and 0.5% of minilaparotomy cases. It is concluded that the vaginal approach cannot be recommended except for surgeons experienced in vaginal surgery.Entities:
Keywords: Acceptor Characteristics; Acceptors; Adnexitis; Age Factors; Bleeding; Body Weight; Comparative Studies; Culdoscopy; Endoscopy; Examinations And Diagnoses; Family Planning; Family Planning Programs; Female Sterilization--complications; Gynecologic Surgery; Headache; Infections; Interval Sterilization; Laparotomy; Marital Status; Parity; Physical Examinations And Diagnoses; Research Methodology; Sterilization, Sexual; Studies; Surgery; Treatment; Urogenital Surgery; Vaginal Approach
Mesh:
Year: 1982 PMID: 6762946 DOI: 10.1016/0010-7824(82)90133-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Contraception ISSN: 0010-7824 Impact factor: 3.375