Literature DB >> 6761969

Ionizing radiation and its risks.

M Goldman.   

Abstract

Penetrating ionizing radiation fairly uniformly puts all exposed molecules and cells at approximately equal risk for deleterious consequences. Thus, the original deposition of radiation energy (that is, the dose) is unaltered by metabolic characteristics of cells and tissue, unlike the situation for chemical agents. Intensely ionizing radiations, such as neutrons and alpha particles, are up to ten times more damaging than sparsely ionizing sources such as x-rays or gamma rays for equivalent doses. Furthermore, repair in cells and tissues can ameliorate the consequences of radiation doses delivered at lower rates by up to a factor of ten compared with comparable doses acutely delivered, especially for somatic (carcinogenic) and genetic effects from x- and gamma-irradiation exposure. Studies on irradiated laboratory animals or on people following occupational, medical or accidental exposures point to an average lifetime fatal cancer risk of about 1 x 10(-4) per rem of dose (100 per 10(6) person-rem). Leukemia and lung, breast and thyroid cancer seem more likely than other types of cancer to be produced by radiation. Radiation exposures from natural sources (cosmic rays and terrestrial radioactivity) of about 0.1 rem per year yield a lifetime cancer risk about 0.1 percent of the normally occurring 20 percent risk of cancer death. An increase of about 1 percent per rem in fatal cancer risk, or 200 rem to double the "background" risk rate, is compared with an estimate of about 100 rem to double the genetic risk. Newer data suggest that the risks for low-level radiation are lower than risks estimated from data from high exposures and that the present 5 rem per year limit for workers is adequate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 6761969      PMCID: PMC1274230     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  West J Med        ISSN: 0093-0415


  3 in total

1.  The effect of whole-body x-irradiation on the median lifespan of female dogs (beagles).

Authors:  A C Andersen; L S Rosenblatt
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1969-07       Impact factor: 2.841

2.  Lifetime studies of 226Ra and 90Sr toxicity in beagles--a status report.

Authors:  O G Raabe; S A Book; N J Parks; C E Chrisp; M Goldman
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1981-06       Impact factor: 2.841

3.  Dose-response relationships for bone tumors in beagles exposed to 226Ra and 90Sr.

Authors:  O G Raabe; N J Parks; S A Book
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  1981-06       Impact factor: 1.316

  3 in total
  5 in total

Review 1.  Effects of irradiation on tumor cell survival, invasion and angiogenesis.

Authors:  Odysseas Kargiotis; Aliki Geka; Jasti S Rao; Athanasios P Kyritsis
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2010-05-07       Impact factor: 4.130

2.  Pathologic changes secondary to radiation.

Authors:  M Berthrong
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Dose-response effect of human equivalent radiation in the mandible.

Authors:  Laura A Monson; X Lin Jing; Alexis Donneys; Aaron S Farberg; Steven R Buchman
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 1.046

Review 4.  The Russian radiation legacy: its integrated impact and lessons.

Authors:  M Goldman
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 5.  Dosimetry in Micro-computed Tomography: a Review of the Measurement Methods, Impacts, and Characterization of the Quantum GX Imaging System.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Meganck; Bob Liu
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 3.488

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.