Literature DB >> 6761267

The protective capacity of immune sera in experimental mouse salmonellosis is mainly due to IgM antibodies.

H Saxen, O Mäkelä.   

Abstract

Passive immunization was used to protect mice against a general infection caused by Salmonella typhimurium and our purpose was to compare the protective capacity of different immunoglobulin isotypes (classes and subclasses). Three antisera were studied, one pool of mouse serum against the envelope of rough bacteria, and two rabbit sera against smooth bacteria. Three different methods were used to separate isotypes. The consistent finding was that only IgM antibodies protected efficiently. A unit of IgG antibodies had an effect that was 1/50th of the IgM effect or less. This effect could have been due to a contamination by IgM. IgA appears to be non-protective like IgG. In two of the antisera a considerable proportion of protective antibodies were against a defined antigenic determinant (anti-0-4,5 or anti-0-9). IgG antibodies of these sera measured by the solid phase assay were also predominantly anti-0-4,5 or anti-0-9, respectively. This argues that the failure of IgG antibodies to protect cannot be explained by assuming that unlike IgM antibodies they are directed against "non-protective" determinants. We conclude that the observed difference between the protective capacities of IgM and IgG antibodies is due to C-region differences between the mu- and gamma-chains.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1982        PMID: 6761267     DOI: 10.1016/0165-2478(82)90110-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Immunol Lett        ISSN: 0165-2478            Impact factor:   3.685


  7 in total

Review 1.  Antibodies and Protection in Systemic Salmonella Infections: Do We Still Have More Questions than Answers?

Authors:  Pietro Mastroeni; Omar Rossi
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2020-09-18       Impact factor: 3.441

2.  Antibody response and protection against challenge in mice vaccinated intraperitoneally with a live aroA O4-O9 hybrid Salmonella dublin strain.

Authors:  A A Lindberg; T Segall; A Weintraub; B A Stocker
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 3.441

3.  Mechanism of protective immunity induced by porin-lipopolysaccharide against murine salmonellosis.

Authors:  S Muthukkumar; V R Muthukkaruppan
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 3.441

4.  Use of hybridoma immunoglobulin switch variants in the analysis of the protective properties of anti-lipopolysaccharide antibodies in Escherichia coli K1 infection.

Authors:  S Pelkonen; G Pluschke
Journal:  Immunology       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 7.397

Review 5.  Pathogenesis and immunity in murine salmonellosis.

Authors:  H S Hsu
Journal:  Microbiol Rev       Date:  1989-12

6.  Isotype of protective anti-Salmonella antibodies in experimental mouse salmonellosis.

Authors:  H Saxén; O Mäkelä; S B Svenson
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 3.441

7.  Long-Term Anti-Bacterial Immunity against Systemic Infection by Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhimurium Elicited by a GMMA-Based Vaccine.

Authors:  Fabio Fiorino; Elena Pettini; Oliver Koeberling; Annalisa Ciabattini; Gianni Pozzi; Laura B Martin; Donata Medaglini
Journal:  Vaccines (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-12
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.