Literature DB >> 6758420

Comparison of different methods for assessment of rubella infection and immunity.

R Braun, C Hornig, G Sann, H W Doerr.   

Abstract

The different enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA), a fluorescence immunoassay (FIAX), and a hemolysis-in-gel test (HIG) were examined for sensitive detection of specific antibodies in sera of persons with acute and previous rubella infection. In comparison to hemagglutination inhibition (HI), all tests were able to detect previously formed rubella antibodies. In sera of patients with acute rubella infection, only the FIAX system showed always positive results. Nevertheless, it remains unclear, if these findings are due to a higher sensitivity of the FIAX system or are possible non-specific results. In some cases, however, this test system failed to detect significant titre rises seen in HI, because it showed high antibody titres already in the first serum sample.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1982        PMID: 6758420

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg A        ISSN: 0174-3031


  4 in total

1.  Intrauterine rubella virus infection despite expected maternal immunity.

Authors:  W Bossart; D Nadal
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 3.267

2.  Cold agglutinins of anti-Pr specificity in rubella embryopathy.

Authors:  A L König; H E Keller; R W Braun; D Roelcke
Journal:  Ann Hematol       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 3.673

3.  Detection of immunoglobulins G and M to rubella virus by time-resolved immunofluorometry.

Authors:  P Shankaran; E Reichstein; M J Khosravi; E P Diamandis
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Congenital rubella syndrome after maternal reinfection.

Authors:  B Weber; G Enders; R Schlösser; B Wegerich; R Koenig; H Rabenau; H W Doerr
Journal:  Infection       Date:  1993 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.553

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.