Literature DB >> 6757208

Hemodynamic effects of positive end-expiratory pressure applied as a ramp.

J J Schreuder, J R Jansen, J M Bogaard, A Versprille.   

Abstract

Hypotheses on the decrease in cardiac output due to positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) were tested during positive-pressure ventilation by application of PEEP from 0 to 15 cmH2O as a ramp input function, i.e., a continuous rise. Yorkshire pigs (n = 47, 5-7 wk old) were used under steady-state anesthesia (pentobarbital) and muscle relaxation. Cardiac output decreased nonlinearly in three distinct phases, I up to PEEP 3 cmH2O, II from 3 to 10 cmH2O, and III above 10 cmH2O, with the sharpest decline occurring in phase II. This three-phase cardiac output decrease was more pronounced when the individual responses were normalized to the inflection points between the phases. Heart rate did not change when related to PEEP, but when normalized to the inflection points a significant increase was observed in the phase I and III, whereas in phase II a decrease was evident. Based on a diversity of hemodynamic responses myocardial depression and right ventricular afterload were rejected as major causal mechanisms for the decrease of cardiac output. We hypothesized that the nonlinear response of cardiac output on PEEP is due to a combination of three types of mechanisms. First, the rise of central venous pressure with PEEP decreases cardiac output linearly. Second, the concomitant fall of arterial pressure elicits compensatory mechanisms, which flatten the slope of this venous return curve. Finally, above 3 cmH2O PEEP a lung stretch reflex is elicited, which performs an inhibitory effect on the circulation, causing the steeper fall in cardiac output as well as the decrease in heart rate in phase II.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 6757208     DOI: 10.1152/jappl.1982.53.5.1239

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol        ISSN: 0161-7567


  9 in total

1.  Tracing best PEEP by applying PEEP as a RAMP.

Authors:  C D Punt; J J Schreuder; J R Jansen; S A Hoeksel; A Versprille
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Suppression of spontaneous breathing during high-frequency jet ventilation. Influence of dynamic changes and static levels of lung stretch.

Authors:  A J van Vught; A Versprille; J R Jansen
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  Tidal variation of pulmonary blood flow and blood volume in piglets during mechanical ventilation during hyper-, normo- and hypovolaemia.

Authors:  A Versprille; J R Jansen
Journal:  Pflugers Arch       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 3.657

4.  Does PEEP-ventilation cause a humorally mediated cardiac output depression in pigs.

Authors:  A Versprille
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 17.440

5.  Interpretation of circulatory shunt-dilution curves as bimodal distribution functions.

Authors:  J L Marinus; C H Massen; E A von Reth; J M Bogaard; J R Jansen; A Versprille
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 2.602

6.  Mean systemic filling pressure as a characteristic pressure for venous return.

Authors:  A Versprille; J R Jansen
Journal:  Pflugers Arch       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 3.657

7.  Hemodynamic effects of high frequency jet ventilation during acute hypovolemia.

Authors:  H F Wei; S A Jin; H S Bi; X Y Ba
Journal:  J Tongji Med Univ       Date:  1991

8.  Influence of changes in cardiac output on the acid-base status of arterial and mixed venous blood.

Authors:  Y L Hoogeveen; J P Zock; P Rispens; W G Zijlstra
Journal:  Pflugers Arch       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 3.657

9.  Hemodynamic, renal and hormonal effects of lung protective ventilation during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy, analysis of secondary outcomes from a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Sidse Høyer; Frank H Mose; Peter Ekeløf; Jørgen B Jensen; Jesper N Bech
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2021-08-05       Impact factor: 2.217

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.