Literature DB >> 6757042

Differential diagnosis of liver parenchymal diseases by likelihood method using 12 laboratory data and age.

T Itoshima, K Kawaguchi, S Morichika, T Ito, S Kiyotoshi, H Ogawa, S Yuasa, S Hattori, M Kitadai, M Ukida, H Nagashima.   

Abstract

Liver parenchymal diseases were statistically diagnosed by likelihood method using 12 routine liver function tests and age. 444 cases of liver diseases were classified into 8 groups by histological diagnosis. A score diagnosis table was made from the data of these cases. For the likelihood diagnosis, data of each case were adapted to the score table and the probable diagnosis was calculated. Correct diagnosis rate of the first probable diagnosis was 50% in all cases and that of the first and the second was 71%. Descending order of the correct diagnosis rate of the first diagnosis was fatty liver (76%), liver cirrhosis (67%), slight histological changes (61%), acute hepatitis (51%), alcoholic liver injury (48%), chronic aggressive hepatitis 2A (43%), chronic persistent hepatitis (40%) and chronic aggressive hepatitis 2B (26%). In conclusion, differential diagnosis of liver parenchymal diseases was made easily with the score table of 13 informations with a considerable success.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 6757042     DOI: 10.1007/bf02774723

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastroenterol Jpn        ISSN: 0435-1339


  23 in total

1.  HEPATIC TESTS IN THE DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS OF JAUNDICE. A STATISTICAL MULTIVARIATE EVALUATION OF COMBINED TESTS.

Authors:  E CARLSTROEM; Y EDLUND; H A HANSEN; K HUGOSSON; B WERDINIUS
Journal:  Scand J Clin Lab Invest       Date:  1963       Impact factor: 1.713

2.  A simple discriminant function for hepatic disease.

Authors:  M Hamilton
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1977-05       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  Diagnosis of liver diseases by laboratory results and discriminant analysis. Identification of best combinations of laboratory tests.

Authors:  H E Solberg; S Skrede; J P Blomhoff
Journal:  Scand J Clin Lab Invest       Date:  1975-12       Impact factor: 1.713

4.  A computer diagnostic system for the diagnosis of prolonged undifferentiating liver disease.

Authors:  F Burbank
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1969-03       Impact factor: 4.965

5.  Modeling techniques for medical diagnosis. II. Differential diagnosis of neonatal hepatitis and biliary atresia.

Authors:  C E Mize; W M Lively; S A Szygenda
Journal:  Comput Biomed Res       Date:  1976-06

6.  Diagnostic value of routine liver tests.

Authors:  P Winkel; K Ramsoe; J Lyngbye; N Tygstrup
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  1975-01       Impact factor: 8.327

7.  [Trial of multifactorial discriminant analysis in the diagnosis of medical, surgical or neoplastic icterus].

Authors:  A Corfa; J Toulet
Journal:  Sem Hop       Date:  1974-06

8.  [Statistical evaluation of biochemical data by the method of discrimination analysis. Selection of the discriminant biochemical variables. Attempted biochemical discrimination of intrahepatic cholestasis, extrahepatic obstruction and liver cancer].

Authors:  G Plomteux; J Toulet; A Albert; N Amrani
Journal:  Ann Biol Clin (Paris)       Date:  1975       Impact factor: 0.459

9.  Use of sequential Bayesian model in diagnosis of jaundice by computer.

Authors:  R P Knill-Jones; R B Stern; D H Girmes; J D Maxwell; R P Thompson; R Williams
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1973-03-03

10.  Diagnostic effectiveness of biochemical liver-function tests, as evaluated by discriminant function analysis.

Authors:  P P Sher
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  1977       Impact factor: 8.327

View more
  1 in total

1.  Ranking of liver tests for differential diagnosis of liver parenchymal diseases.

Authors:  T Itoshima; K Kawaguchi; S Morichika; T Ito; S Kiyotoshi; H Ogawa; S Yuasa; S Hattori; M Kitadai; S Mizutani; M Ukida; H Nagashima
Journal:  Gastroenterol Jpn       Date:  1983-04
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.