Literature DB >> 6756133

Risk of handling injectable antineoplastic agents.

R W Anderson, W H Puckett, W J Dana, T V Nguyen, J C Theiss, T S Matney.   

Abstract

Uptake of mutagenic substances by persons handling injectable antineoplastic agents was studied, and various methods of preventing such exposure were evaluated. Six persons who prepared i.v. admixtures individually collected their urine in 24-hour batches during several eight-day study periods; each prepared from 12 to 90 admixtures per working day during each period. I.V. personnel prepared admixtures in both horizontal laminar-flow hoods and vertical-flow biological-safety cabinets, and using gloves and masks. Three pharmacy personnel who did not handle any drugs served as controls. Urine was concentrated (each 24-hour sample was concentrated to about 1 ml), and the Salmonella/mammalian microsome mutagenicity test (Ames test) was used to detect mutagenic activity in the urine concentrates. Mutagenicity was observed in the urine of all personnel during periods when they prepared antineoplastic admixtures in horizontal laminar-flow hoods, both when using no protection and while wearing gloves or masks. When admixtures were prepared in the vertical-flow biological safety cabinet by personnel wearing gloves, no urine mutagenicity was detected. The control group showed no urine mutagenicity. Protective intervention methods should be used by all persons handling antineoplastic agents. Guidelines for handling these drugs are presented.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1982        PMID: 6756133

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hosp Pharm        ISSN: 0002-9289


  20 in total

Review 1.  Drugs hazardous to healthcare workers. Evaluation of methods for monitoring occupational exposure to cytostatic drugs.

Authors:  P J Sessink; R P Bos
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 2.  Biological safety cabinetry.

Authors:  R H Kruse; W H Puckett; J H Richardson
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 26.132

Review 3.  The risks of handling cytotoxic drugs. II. Recommendations for working with cytotoxic drugs.

Authors:  G P Kaijser; W J Underberg; J H Beijnen
Journal:  Pharm Weekbl Sci       Date:  1990-12-14

Review 4.  The risks of handling cytotoxic drugs. I. Methods of testing exposure.

Authors:  G P Kaijser; W J Underberg; J H Beijnen
Journal:  Pharm Weekbl Sci       Date:  1990-12-14

Review 5.  Reproductive health risks associated with occupational exposures to antineoplastic drugs in health care settings: a review of the evidence.

Authors:  Thomas H Connor; Christina C Lawson; Martha Polovich; Melissa A McDiarmid
Journal:  J Occup Environ Med       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 2.162

6.  Evaluation of genotoxic risk of handling cytostatic drugs in clinical pharmacy practice.

Authors:  E P Guinée; G H Beuman; G Hageman; I J Welle; J C Kleinjans
Journal:  Pharm Weekbl Sci       Date:  1991-04-26

Review 7.  Biological monitoring: state of the art.

Authors:  P Hoet; V Haufroid
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 4.402

8.  Urine mutagenicity, chromosomal abnormalities and sister chromatid exchanges in lymphocytes of nurses handling cytostatic drugs.

Authors:  I Stucker; A Hirsch; T Doloy; I Bastie-Sigeac; D Hemon
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 3.015

9.  Reduction in Surface Contamination With Cyclophosphamide in 30 US Hospital Pharmacies Following Implementation of a Closed-System Drug Transfer Device.

Authors:  Paul J M Sessink; Jason Trahan; Joseph W Coyne
Journal:  Hosp Pharm       Date:  2013-03

10.  Leukaemia and reproductive outcome among nurses handling antineoplastic drugs.

Authors:  T Skov; B Maarup; J Olsen; M Rørth; H Winthereik; E Lynge
Journal:  Br J Ind Med       Date:  1992-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.