Literature DB >> 6753887

A placebo-controlled study to determine the efficacy of oral disopyramide phosphate for the prophylaxis of ventricular dysrhythmias after acute myocardial infarction.

C R Kumana, V S Rambihar, P H Tanser, J A Cairns, R N Gupta, R A Wildeman, M Johnston, A L Johnson, M Gent.   

Abstract

1 To evaluate oral disopyramide phosphate in the prophylaxis of dysrhythmias occurring in acute myocardial infarction (MI) patients (presenting within 12 h of symptoms, age 21-70 years), a placebo-controlled, randomized double-blind, in hospital trial was conducted. After prognostic stratification (anterior and non-anterior MI at each of 4 regional hospitals) patients were randomly assigned to receive oral disopyramide phosphate (loading dose 150, 200, or 300 mg followed 6 h later by 100, 150, or 200 mg every 6 h for patients assessed to weigh less than 55, 55-85, or greater than 85 kg, respectively or matching placebo. The primary exclusion criteria were overt heart failure, systolic BP less than 100 mmHg, significant heart block or history of urinary retention. Active drug or placebo was continued for 7 days or until (a) detection of "warning arrhythmias' requiring i.v. lignocaine intervention (greater than 5 for 7 days or until (a) detection of "warning arrhythmias' requiring i.v. lignocaine intervention (greater than 5 premature ventricular contractions (PVCs)/min, R on T PVCs, multifocal PVCs, bigeminal PVCs, ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation) or (b) onset of exclusion criteria. In addition, plasma drug concentrations were determined and 24 h electrocardiographic tapes were obtained on day 1, and on one of days 4-7 but these results are not presented here. 2 Out of 121 patients entering the trial, 101 had confirmatory ECG and enzyme changes. Of these, 9 of 47 patients receiving disopyramide phosphate required lignocaine compared to 20 of 54 receiving placebo (19% v 37%; P = 0.047). Corresponding numbers for patients discontinuing trial medication for other non-fatal complications of MI were 5 and 3, and for those dying, were 3 (2 infarct extensions and 1 massive infarction), and 0, respectively. Respective numbers discontinuing trial medication for possible drug side effects (viz. urinary retention requiring catheterization) were 6 and 1 (P = 0.031). 3 In circumstances where i.v. therapy is deemed impractical, use of oral disopyramide phosphate given prophylactically in patients with acute MI may reduce the incidence of "warning arrhythmias' by a clinically significant extent.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1982        PMID: 6753887      PMCID: PMC1427600          DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1982.tb02023.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0306-5251            Impact factor:   4.335


  20 in total

1.  The pharmacokinetics of Norpace.

Authors:  A Karim
Journal:  Angiology       Date:  1975-01       Impact factor: 3.619

2.  Lidocaine in the prevention of primary ventricular fibrillation. A double-blind, randomized study of 212 consecutive patients.

Authors:  K I Lie; H J Wellens; F J van Capelle; D Durrer
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1974-12-19       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Characteristics and predictability of primary ventricular fibrillation.

Authors:  K I Lie; H J Wellens; D Durrer
Journal:  Eur J Cardiol       Date:  1974-04

4.  Use of plasma levels in evaluation of procainamide dosage.

Authors:  T R Shaw; C R Kumana; R B Royds; C M Padgham; J Hamer
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1974-03

5.  Comprehensive treatment plan for the prevention of primary ventricular fibrillation in acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  M G Wyman; L Hammersmith
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1974-05-06       Impact factor: 2.778

6.  Antiarrhythmic prophylaxis in acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  J Koch-Weser
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1971-10-28       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Antiarrhythmic prophylaxis with procainamide in acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  J Koch-Weser; S W Klein; L L Foo-Canto; J A Kastor; R W DeSanctis
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1969-12-04       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Pharmacokinetics of lidocaine in man.

Authors:  R N Boyes; D B Scott; P J Jebson; M J Godman; D G Julian
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1971 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 6.875

9.  Oral disopyramide in prophylaxis of arrhythmias following myocardial infarction.

Authors:  G Jennings; M S Jones; E M Besterman; D G Model; P P Turner; P H Kidner
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1976-01-10       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Comparison of arrhythmia computer and conventional monitoring in coronary-care unit.

Authors:  N J Vetter; D G Julian
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1975-05-24       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  3 in total

1.  Absorption and antidysrhythmic activity of oral disopyramide phosphate after acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  C R Kumana; V S Rambihar; K Willis; R N Gupta; P H Tanser; J A Cairns; R A Wildeman; M Johnston; A L Johnson; M Gent
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1982-10       Impact factor: 4.335

2.  Disopyramide in acute myocardial infarction: problems with changing pharmacokinetics.

Authors:  H L Elliott; A H Thomson; S M Bryson
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 3.  Disopyramide. A reappraisal of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic use in cardiac arrhythmias.

Authors:  R N Brogden; P A Todd
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 9.546

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.