Literature DB >> 6750166

Comparison of propranolol and hydrochlorothiazide for thr initial treatment of hypertension. I. Results of short-term titration with emphasis on racial differences in response. Veterans Administration Cooperative Study Group on Antihypertensive agents.

.   

Abstract

We compared hydrochlorothiazide and propranolol hydrochloride for monotherapy of hypertension by a double-blind study of 683 men who were titrated to less than 90 mm Hg diastolic BP or to 640 mg of propranolol or 200 mg of hydrochlorothiazide. Propranolol reduced systolic BP from 146.0 +/- 14.4 (SD) to 134.8 +/- 16.3 mm Hg and diastolic BP from 101.6 +/- 4.6 to 90.5 +/- 7.5 mm Hg. Hydrochlorothiazide lowered both systolic BP more effectively from 146.5 +/- 15.8 to 128.8 +/- 12.2 mm Hg and diastolic BP from 101.3 +/- 4.5 to 89.4 +/- 6.5 mm Hg. In blacks, hydrochlorothiazide lowered systolic BP 20.3 +/- 14.3 mm Hg v 8.2 +/- 12.2 mm Hg for propranolol; hydrochlorothiazide reduced diastolic BP 13.0 +/- 7.0 mm Hg v 9.5 +/- 7.0 for propranolol. In whites, the systolic BP reductions were 15.3 +/- 12.0 mm Hg for hydrochlorothiazide v 13.2 +/- 13.1 mmn Hg for propranolol; diastolic BPs were 10.9 +/- 5.7 mm Hg for hydrochlorothiazide and 12.6 +/- 6.6 mm Hg for propranolol. In blacks treated with hydrochlorothiazide, 71.3% achieved diastolic BP of less than 90 mm Hg, v 53.5% with propranolol. There was no racial difference in dose response to propranolol, but blacks required much less hydrochlorothiazide to achieve control. We conclude that in this short-term study propranolol was as efficacious as hydrochlorothiazide in whites, but the latter was more effective than propranolol in blacks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1982        PMID: 6750166

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  43 in total

1.  Racial differences in drug response: isoproterenol effects before and after propranolol.

Authors:  D R Rutledge; A Wallace; J D Steinberg; L Cardozo; S J Lavine
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 4.200

Review 2.  Management of hypertension in ethnic minorities.

Authors:  Jawad M Khan; D Gareth Beevers
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 3.  Ethnic differences in drug disposition and responsiveness.

Authors:  A J Wood; H H Zhou
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 4.  Creatine kinase, energy reserve, and hypertension: from bench to bedside.

Authors:  Lizzy M Brewster
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2018-08

5.  Comparative Outcomes After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Among Black and White Patients Treated at US Veterans Affairs Hospitals.

Authors:  Taisei Kobayashi; Thomas J Glorioso; Ehrin J Armstrong; Thomas M Maddox; Mary E Plomondon; Gary K Grunwald; Steven M Bradley; Thomas T Tsai; Stephen W Waldo; Sunil V Rao; Subhash Banerjee; Brahmajee K Nallamothu; Deepak L Bhatt; A Garvey Rene; Robert L Wilensky; Peter W Groeneveld; Jay Giri
Journal:  JAMA Cardiol       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 14.676

Review 6.  Acebutolol. A review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic efficacy in hypertension, angina pectoris and arrhythmia.

Authors:  B N Singh; W R Thoden; A Ward
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 9.546

7.  Comparison of a lifestyle modification program with propranolol use in the management of diastolic hypertension.

Authors:  E J Pérez-Stable; T J Coates; R B Baron; B S Biró; W W Hauck; K S McHenry; P S Gardiner; D Feigal
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 8.  The effects of antihypertensive drugs on serum lipids and lipoproteins, I. Diuretics.

Authors:  R P Ames
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 9.546

9.  Effect of chronic treatment with enalapril on glucose tolerance and serum insulin in non-insulin-resistant Japanese patients with essential hypertension.

Authors:  T Baba; T Kodama; T Ishizaki
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 10.  Diuretic drugs. Progress in clinical pharmacology.

Authors:  A Lant
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 9.546

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.