Literature DB >> 6748828

Mastoidectomy for acquired cholesteatoma: follow-up to 20 years.

D T Cody, T J McDonald.   

Abstract

The results of 423 mastoidectomies for acquired cholesteatoma were reanalyzed 6 years after the first analysis. The mastoidectomies were placed into three groups: open-cavity, 135 modified radical and 37 radical; obliterated-cavity, 60 modified radical and 20 radical in which the mastoid cavities were obliterated with pedicle muscle grafts; and intact-canal-wall, 69 complete and 102 complete with opening of the facial recess. The following observations were made. The cholesteatoma failure rate increased: for the open-cavity group, from 6% to 7%; obliterated-cavity group, 16% to 18%; intact-canal-wall group, 35% to 45%. The precholesteatoma (retraction pocket) failure rate in the open-cavity and obliterated-cavity groups did not change. In the intact-canal-wall group, recurrent cholesteatomas developed in 8 cases initially classified as precholesteatoma failures. In 9 initially classified as successful, retraction pockets developed and 7 of these went on to recurrent cholesteatomas. Consequently, despite the progressive increase in formation of retraction pockets, the overall incidence dropped from 20% to 16%. Failure due to chronic or frequent recurrent infection did not change in the open-cavity and intact-canal-wall groups. However, in the obliterated-cavity group, it increased from 4% to 5%. The overall failure rate increased: open-cavity group, 18% to 19%; obliterated-cavity group, 29% to 30%; intact-canal-wall group, 60% to 66%.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6748828

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Laryngoscope        ISSN: 0023-852X            Impact factor:   3.325


  6 in total

1.  Retrospective and prospective study of singapore swing method on healing of mastoid cavity.

Authors:  Mangal Singh; Sachin Jain; Ruchi Rajput; Rabindra K Khatua; Devashish Sharma
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2011-01-04

2.  Osteoplastic atticoantrotomy with autologous bone chips and a bony attic strut in cholesteatoma surgery.

Authors:  Eckard Gehrking
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2009-12-02       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Functional results after cholesteatoma surgery in an adult population using the retrograde mastoidectomy technique.

Authors:  Amir Minovi; Johanna Venjacob; Stefan Volkenstein; John Dornhoffer; Stefan Dazert
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 4.  Updates and knowledge gaps in cholesteatoma research.

Authors:  Chin-Lung Kuo; An-Suey Shiao; Matthew Yung; Masafumi Sakagami; Holger Sudhoff; Chih-Hung Wang; Chyong-Hsin Hsu; Chiang-Feng Lien
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-03-18       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Outpatient management of cholesteatoma with canal wall reconstruction tympanomastoidectomy.

Authors:  Richard Kao; Todd Wannemuehler; Charles W Yates; Rick F Nelson
Journal:  Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol       Date:  2017-10-31

6.  Outcomes of Modified Canal Wall Down Mastoidectomy and Mastoid Obliteration Using Autologous Materials.

Authors:  Bo Gyung Kim; Hyo Jun Kim; Seung Jae Lee; Eunsang Lee; Se A Lee; Jong Dae Lee
Journal:  Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 3.372

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.