Literature DB >> 6748693

Calculation and application of the anterior surface area of a model human cornea.

L S Kwok.   

Abstract

The macroscopic anterior surface area was calculated for three models of the average human cornea. Two models, a general ellipsoid and a rotational ellipse (rotationally symmetric ellipsoid) gave a surface area of 132 mm2, while a spherical model gave 126 mm2. A general ellipsoidal model having the maximum radius horizontal (with-the-rule corneal astigmatism) has less surface area than a rotational ellipse with the same horizontal radius. For a corneal sagittal height of 2.59 mm, the surface area of an ellipsoidal cornea equals -19.2Q + 16.3R -0.476 which specifies a rotational ellipse (radius R, asphericity Q) of equal surface area. In a cornea with the maximum radius vertical (against-the-rule corneal astigmatism), the ellipsoid has slightly more surface area than a rotational ellipse with the same horizontal radius of curvature. For a given horizontal radius of curvature, the sphere has the lowest surface area. For a corneal sagittal height s of 2.59 mm, the sphere underestimates by 8% the surface area of a rotational ellipse with asphericity -0.5. The anterior corneal surface area of a rotational ellipse model, radius R, asphericity Q is given by 2 pi Rs- 19.2Q. In all three models, the surface area increases with horizontal radius of curvature. In the rotational ellipse model, the rate of increase (slope) is independent of asphericity, and the slope found in with-the-rule astigmatism is less than the slope found with against-the-rule astigmatism. The calculated surface area predicts a precorneal tear volume of 0.86 microliter for a 6.5 micron tear thickness. The apparent, or plane projected are of an epithelial lesion underestimates the curved surface area with a percentage error that increases rapidly with lesion diameter. For a 12 mm diameter lesion on a rotational ellipse model, the apparent area underestimates the surface area by 18%. The average posterior corneal surface in human is not spherical but imitates the anterior surface, and has an area of 137 mm2 or 3.8% greater than the anterior area.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6748693     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5193(84)80072-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Theor Biol        ISSN: 0022-5193            Impact factor:   2.691


  7 in total

1.  Kinematics of epithelial wound closure in the rabbit cornea.

Authors:  L S Kwok
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  Measurement of corneal diameter.

Authors:  L S Kwok
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 4.638

3.  Autologous dermis graft at the time of evisceration or enucleation.

Authors:  M Reza Vagefi; Tristan F W McMullan; John R Burroughs; David K Isaacs; Angelo Tsirbas; George L White; Richard L Anderson; John D McCann
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 4.638

4.  Identification of presumed corneal neuromas and microneuromas using laser-scanning in vivo confocal microscopy: a systematic review.

Authors:  Holly Rose Chinnery; Rajni Rajan; Haihan Jiao; Mengliang Wu; Alexis Ceecee Zhang; Manikkuwadura Eranda Harshan De Silva; Eve Makrai; Mary Ann Stepp; Nick Di Girolamo; Laura Elizabeth Downie
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 5.908

5.  Optimizing the role of limbal explant size and source in determining the outcomes of limbal transplantation: An in vitro study.

Authors:  Abhinav Reddy Kethiri; Sayan Basu; Sachin Shukla; Virender Singh Sangwan; Vivek Singh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-09-28       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Effects of explant size on epithelial outgrowth, thickness, stratification, ultrastructure and phenotype of cultured limbal epithelial cells.

Authors:  O A Utheim; L Pasovic; S Raeder; J R Eidet; I G Fostad; A Sehic; B Roald; M F de la Paz; T Lyberg; D A Dartt; T P Utheim
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-03-12       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  How to Avoid an Upside-Down Orientation of the Graft during Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty?

Authors:  Joanna Wasielica-Poslednik; Alexander K Schuster; Lilian Rauch; Jessica Glaner; Aytan Musayeva; Jana C Riedl; Norbert Pfeiffer; Adrian Gericke
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-08-04       Impact factor: 1.909

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.