Literature DB >> 6748687

Local resource competition and the evolution of male-biased sex ratios.

J B Silk.   

Abstract

In many mammalian species, maturing males disperse from their natal groups, while females remain near their places of birth. If sources are limited locally, related females may be forced to compete with one another for access to resources, while mature males will compete primarily with unrelated individuals in non-natal groups. Clark (1978) suggested that under such circumstances the extent of competition among females could be reduced if females uniformly skewed the sex ratio of their offspring in favor of males. Skewed secondary sex ratios and investment patterns in galagos and red deer appear to be consistent with this hypothesis. Several authors have recently demonstrated that the evolution of skewed sex ratios may be influenced by population structure, and Wilson & Colwell (1981) have shown that male-biased sex ratios can evolve in structured haplodiploid populations. Here, I construct an intrademic group selection model to simulate the effects of density-dependent mortality upon diploid populations structured much as Clark describes: males disperse, females remain near their female relatives, and local resource competition limits the size of local groups. The results confirm that male-biased sex ratios can evolve in a diploid species, even when groups are large and the skew in sex ratio is substantial.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6748687     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5193(84)80066-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Theor Biol        ISSN: 0022-5193            Impact factor:   2.691


  10 in total

1.  Reconsidering the null hypothesis: Is maternal rank associated with birth sex ratios in primate groups?

Authors:  Gillian R Brown; Joan B Silk
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-08-12       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Maternal effects and range expansion: a key factor in a dynamic process?

Authors:  Renée A Duckworth
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-04-27       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Local resource competition and local resource enhancement shape primate birth sex ratios.

Authors:  Joan B Silk; Gillian R Brown
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-08-07       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Sex ratio and intrasexual kin competition in mammals.

Authors:  Andrew Cockburn; Michelle P Scott; Chris R Dickman
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Male-biased reproduction and sex-ratio adjustment in muskrats.

Authors:  M J Caley; S Boutin; R A Moses
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  A haplodiploid mite adjusts fecundity and sex ratio in response to density changes during the reproductive period.

Authors:  Nuwan Weerawansha; Qiao Wang; Xiong Zhao He
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2022-10-15       Impact factor: 2.380

7.  Reproductive parameters over a 37-year period of free-ranging female Borneo orangutans at Sepilok Orangutan Rehabilitation Centre.

Authors:  Noko Kuze; Symphorosa Sipangkui; Titol Peter Malim; Henry Bernard; Laurentius N Ambu; Shiro Kohshima
Journal:  Primates       Date:  2008-02-26       Impact factor: 2.163

8.  A comparative study of litter size and sex composition in a large dataset of callitrichine monkeys.

Authors:  Dakota E McCoy; Brett M Frye; Jennifer Kotler; Judith M Burkart; Monika Burns; Amanda Embury; Simon Eyre; Peter Galbusera; Jacqui Hooper; Arun Idoe; Agustín López Goya; Jennifer Mickelberg; Marcos Peromingo Quesada; Miranda Stevenson; Sara Sullivan; Mark Warneke; Sheila Wojciechowski; Dominic Wormell; David Haig; Suzette D Tardif
Journal:  Am J Primatol       Date:  2019-08-06       Impact factor: 2.371

9.  Maternal effects obscure condition-dependent sex allocation in changing environments.

Authors:  A M Edwards; E Z Cameron; E Wapstra; J McEvoy
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2019-04-03       Impact factor: 2.963

10.  Gestational experience alters sex allocation in the subsequent generation.

Authors:  A M Edwards; E Z Cameron; J C Pereira; E Wapstra; M A Ferguson-Smith; S R Horton; K Thomasson
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2016-07-13       Impact factor: 2.963

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.