Literature DB >> 6748207

Discovery of new adverse drug reactions. A review of the Food and Drug Administration's spontaneous reporting system.

A C Rossi, D E Knapp.   

Abstract

Recently, several studies of spontaneous reporting systems (SRSs) have reported on the published literature's role in producing first reports of new adverse drug reactions. In order to provide further information on other components of SRS, the Food and Drug Administration's SRS was examined with regard to its effectiveness and efficiency in identifying new adverse drug reactions and the form, consistency, and timeliness of its communication of new adverse drug reactions to the medical community. While there was evidence that the literature was more effective in producing first reports of new adverse drug reactions for the years compared, there was reason to conclude that FDA's SRS was capable of making a contribution to the alerting process. Moreover, direct participation by practitioners in FDA's SRS was found to be the most efficiently obtained FDA source of new adverse drug reaction reports.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6748207

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  8 in total

1.  Comparison of 500 spontaneous and 500 published reports of adverse drug reactions.

Authors:  F Haramburu; B Bégaud; J C Péré
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 2.953

2.  Can adverse drug reactions be detected earlier? A comparison of reports by patients and professionals.

Authors:  T C Egberts; M Smulders; F H de Koning; R H Meyboom; H G Leufkens
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-08-31

3.  Postmarketing surveillance of adverse drug reactions: problems and solutions.

Authors:  F M Lortie
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1986-07-01       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 4.  Drug allergy: an overview.

Authors:  R D DeSwarte
Journal:  Clin Rev Allergy       Date:  1986-05

5.  Sources of information on lymphoma associated with anti-tumour necrosis factor agents: comparison of published case reports and cases reported to the French pharmacovigilance system.

Authors:  Hélène Théophile; Thierry Schaeverbeke; Ghada Miremont-Salamé; Abdelilah Abouelfath; Valentine Kahn; Françoise Haramburu; Bernard Bégaud
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 6.  Does proof of casualty ever exist in pharmacovigilance?

Authors:  M Auriche; E Loupi
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 5.606

7.  Physician response to patient reports of adverse drug effects: implications for patient-targeted adverse effect surveillance.

Authors:  Beatrice A Golomb; John J McGraw; Marcella A Evans; Joel E Dimsdale
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 8.  Statin adverse effects : a review of the literature and evidence for a mitochondrial mechanism.

Authors:  Beatrice A Golomb; Marcella A Evans
Journal:  Am J Cardiovasc Drugs       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.571

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.