Literature DB >> 6746683

Idiopathic scoliosis in three dimensions. A radiographic and morphometric analysis.

P Deacon, B M Flood, R A Dickson.   

Abstract

Eleven articulated scoliotic spines were examined radiographically and morphometrically. Measurement of the curve on anteroposterior radiographs of the specimens gave a mean Cobb angle of 70 degrees, though true anteroposterior radiographs of the deformity revealed a mean Cobb angle of 99 degrees (41% greater). Lateral radiographs gave the erroneous impression that there was a mean kyphosis of 41 degrees while true lateral projections revealed a mean apical lordosis of 14 degrees. Morphometric measurements confirmed the presence of a lordosis at bony level, the apical vertebral bodies being significantly taller anteriorly (P less than 0.02). There were significant correlations (P less than 0.01) between the true size of the lateral scoliosis, the amount of axial rotation and the size of the apical lordosis. This study illustrates the three-dimensional nature of the deformity in scoliosis and its property of changing in character and magnitude according to the plane of radiographic projection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6746683     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.66B4.6746683

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br        ISSN: 0301-620X


  30 in total

1.  Severe axial vertebral rotation treated with a modified Boston brace: a case report.

Authors:  Eustathios I Kenanidis; Michael E Potoupnis; Kyriakos A Papavasiliou; Fares E Sayegh; George A Kapetanos
Journal:  Scoliosis       Date:  2010-03-24

2.  Measurement of vertebral rotation in idiopathic scoliosis using the Perdriolle torsionmeter: a clinical study on intraobserver and interobserver error.

Authors:  H Omeroğlu; O Ozekin; A Biçimoğlu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Spine slenderness and wedging in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis and in asymptomatic population: an observational retrospective study.

Authors:  Claudio Vergari; Mohammad Karam; Raphael Pietton; Raphael Vialle; Ismat Ghanem; Wafa Skalli; Ayman Assi
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2020-02-18       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Vertebral deformities and scoliosis.

Authors:  C Coillard; C H Rivard
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Patient-specific 3D models created by 3D imaging system or bi-planar imaging coupled with Moiré-Fringe projections: a comparative study of accuracy and reliability on spinal curvatures and vertebral rotation data.

Authors:  Arnaud Hocquelet; François Cornelis; Anna Jirot; Laurent Castaings; Mathieu de Sèze; Olivier Hauger
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Dural ectasia in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: quantitative assessment on magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Kasim Abul-Kasim; Angelica Overgaard; Acke Ohlin
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-03-09       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  A three-dimensional analysis of scoliosis progression in non-idiopathic scoliosis: is it similar to adolescent idiopathic scoliosis?

Authors:  Keith R Bachmann; Burt Yaszay; Carrie E Bartley; Tracey P Bastrom; Fredrick G Reighard; Vidyadhar V Upasani; Peter O Newton
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2019-06-10       Impact factor: 1.475

Review 8.  A systematic review of the clinical effectiveness of EOS 2D/3D X-ray imaging system.

Authors:  Ros Wade; Huiqin Yang; Claire McKenna; Rita Faria; Nigel Gummerson; Nerys Woolacott
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-08-19       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Biomechanical simulations of the spine deformation process in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis from different pathogenesis hypotheses.

Authors:  I Villemure; C E Aubin; J Dansereau; H Labelle
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2004-01-17       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  A comparison of four techniques to measure anterior and posterior vertebral body heights and sagittal plane wedge angles in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Nicolas Newell; Caroline A Grant; Bethany E Keenan; Maree T Izatt; Mark J Pearcy; Clayton J Adam
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2016-06-30       Impact factor: 2.602

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.