Literature DB >> 6746177

Biological and technological variability of three anaerobic ergometer tests.

A R Coggan, D L Costill.   

Abstract

To assess the relative biological and technological variability of anaerobic testing, 27 male subjects performed either 30- or 60-s sprint bouts on a hydraulically braked Fitron ergometer or timed rides to exhaustion at 125% VO2max on an electrically braked Collins ergometer. Each subject performed four trials within a 4-week period, with blood drawn 10 min post-exercise for lactate determination. Total variability was estimated from the mean coefficient of variation (CV = SD/means X 100%) for each variable. There were no significant differences across the four trials of each test for any of the variables measured (mean power or ride time, peak torque, fatiguability, or blood lactate). There were also no significant differences in test variabilities. The mean CV of performance were 5.4%, 5.4%, and 5.3% for the 30-s Fitron, 60-s Fitron, and exhaustive tests, respectively. The magnitude of this variability is nearly identical to that reported for tests of aerobic fitness. Only 10%-30% of the variability was of technological origin. This variability must be considered in the interpretation of experiments utilizing anaerobic performance tests.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6746177     DOI: 10.1055/s-2008-1025896

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Sports Med        ISSN: 0172-4622            Impact factor:   3.118


  13 in total

Review 1.  Respiratory muscle training in healthy individuals: physiological rationale and implications for exercise performance.

Authors:  A William Sheel
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 2.  Validity, reliability and sensitivity of measures of sporting performance.

Authors:  Kevin Currell; Asker E Jeukendrup
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 11.136

3.  Blood lactate concentration following intermittent and continuous cycling tests of anaerobic capacity.

Authors:  L P Koziris; D L Montgomery
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1991

4.  Muscle metabolism during 30, 60 and 90 s of maximal cycling on an air-braked ergometer.

Authors:  R T Withers; W M Sherman; D G Clark; P C Esselbach; S R Nolan; M H Mackay; M Brinkman
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1991

Review 5.  Standard anaerobic exercise tests.

Authors:  H Vandewalle; G Pérès; H Monod
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1987 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 11.136

6.  Enhanced pulmonary and active skeletal muscle gas exchange during intense exercise after sprint training in men.

Authors:  M J McKenna; G J Heigenhauser; R S McKelvie; G Obminski; J D MacDougall; N L Jones
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1997-06-15       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 7.  Children's and adolescents' anaerobic performance during cycle ergometry.

Authors:  C A Williams
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 8.  Reliability of power in physical performance tests.

Authors:  W G Hopkins; E J Schabort; J A Hawley
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 9.  Measurement of anaerobic capacities in humans. Definitions, limitations and unsolved problems.

Authors:  S Green; B Dawson
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 11.136

10.  The effect of normocapnic hypoxia and the duration of exposure to hypoxia on supramaximal exercise performance.

Authors:  T M McLellan; S S Cheung; M R Meunier
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1993
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.