Literature DB >> 6745286

Aortic input impedance in heart failure: comparison with normal subjects and its changes during vasodilator therapy.

J P Merillon, G Fontenier, J F Lerallut, M Y Jaffrin, J Chastre, P Assayag, G Motte, R Gourgon.   

Abstract

This study was aimed at the evaluation of aortic impedance in patients with congestive heart failure. Aortic impedance (simultaneous measurements of aortic pressure and blood flow), mean (Wm) and pulsatile (Wp) powers were compared in 11 normal subjects and in 12 patients with heart failure. Pulse wave velocity (C: modified Moëns-Korteweg equation, simultaneous measurements of aortic pressure and radius) was determined under control conditions in all normal subjects and in 7 patients with heart failure. Impedance curves in patients with heart failure were characterized by increased values of the impedance modulus at 0 Hz (peripheral resistance) and at low frequencies. The characteristic impedance, C, and phase were not different from normal subjects. In six patients with heart failure, impedance curves were studied during nitroprusside infusion. During the infusion of the vasodilator, the impedance modulus at 0 Hz and at low frequencies decreased. The characteristic impedance was unchanged. The zero intercept of the phase was shifted towards lower frequencies. These results show that the changes in impedance curves in patients with heart failure are due to greater peripheral resistance and wave reflection. During nitroprusside infusion the stroke volume increased and the aortic blood flow became more pulsatile (greater values of low frequency components). This modification accounts for the increased values of Wm and Wp, and is related to decreased peripheral resistance and wave reflection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6745286     DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a061690

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Heart J        ISSN: 0195-668X            Impact factor:   29.983


  7 in total

Review 1.  Arterial aging: a review of the pathophysiology and potential for pharmacological intervention.

Authors:  Michael F O'Rourke; Audrey Adji; Mayooran Namasivayam; Jonathan Mok
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2011-10-01       Impact factor: 3.923

2.  Noninvasive evaluation of the influence of aortic wave reflection on left ventricular ejection during auxotonic contraction.

Authors:  H Miyashita; U Ikeda; Y Tsuruya; H Sekiguchi; K Shimada; T Yaginuma
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.037

3.  Benefit of glyceryl trinitrate on arterial stiffness is directly due to effects on peripheral arteries.

Authors:  A L Pauca; N D Kon; M F O'Rourke
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2005-03-10       Impact factor: 5.994

4.  Arterial mechanical properties in dilated cardiomyopathy. Aging and the response to nitroprusside.

Authors:  J D Carroll; S Shroff; P Wirth; M Halsted; S I Rajfer
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 14.808

5.  Determination of Aortic Characteristic Impedance and Total Arterial Compliance From Regional Pulse Wave Velocities Using Machine Learning: An in-silico Study.

Authors:  Vasiliki Bikia; Georgios Rovas; Stamatia Pagoulatou; Nikolaos Stergiopulos
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2021-05-13

6.  Aortic distensibility measured by pulse-wave velocity is not modified in patients with Chagas' disease.

Authors:  Humberto Villacorta; Luiz Aparecido Bortolotto; Edmundo Arteaga; Charles Mady
Journal:  J Negat Results Biomed       Date:  2006-06-12

Review 7.  Are HFpEF and HFmrEF So Different? The Need to Understand Distinct Phenotypes.

Authors:  Alberto Palazzuoli; Matteo Beltrami
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2021-05-21
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.