Literature DB >> 6743426

HV interval in calcific aortic stenosis. Relation to left ventricular function and effect of valve replacement.

K Rasmussen, P E Thomsen, J P Bagger.   

Abstract

Intracardiac electrography and 24 hour ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring were carried out in 20 patients with calcific aortic stenosis (mean pressure gradient 86 mm Hg) to investigate (a) the role of bradycardia and tachycardia in the pathogenesis of syncope in aortic stenosis, (b) the relation between haemodynamic data and electrophysiological abnormalities, and (c) whether valve replacement corrects electrophysiological abnormalities. Intracardiac electrograms showed impaired sinus node function in five patients and a prolonged HV interval (greater than or equal to 50 ms) in 11 but there was no difference in the findings of 13 patients with syncope and seven without. Ambulatory monitoring showed short pauses in three patients and brief episodes of tachycardia in four, but there was no difference in the findings of patients with and without syncope. The HV interval correlated inversely with the left ventricular ejection fraction, whereas no correlation was found between the HV interval and the pressure gradient. Nine patients were re-evaluated 15 months after aortic valve replacement. No change was found in sinus node function, but the HV interval had increased by 7.8 ms. It is concluded that in calcific aortic stenosis neither bradycardia nor tachycardia is shown to be a frequent cause of syncope, a prolonged HV interval is a frequent finding and further prolongation occurs after valve replacement, and contractility and conductivity appear to deteriorate in parallel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6743426      PMCID: PMC481589          DOI: 10.1136/hrt.52.1.82

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br Heart J        ISSN: 0007-0769


  11 in total

1.  Sites of conduction disease in aortic stenosis: significance of valve gradient and calcification.

Authors:  R C Dhingra; F Amat-y-Leon; R J Pietras; C Wyndham; P C Deedwania; D Wu; P Denes; K M Rosen
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1977-09       Impact factor: 25.391

2.  Premature atrial stimulation as a key to the understanding of sinoatrial conduction in man. Presentation of data and critical review of the literature.

Authors:  H C Strauss; A L Saroff; J T Bigger; E G Giardina
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1973-01       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  Changes in the QRS complex after aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  F Follath; W R Ginks
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1972-06

4.  Syncope and sudden death in aortic stenosis.

Authors:  L S Schwartz; J Goldfischer; G J Sprague; S P Schwartz
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1969-05       Impact factor: 2.778

5.  Left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction by echocardiography.

Authors:  J F Pombo; B L Troy; R O Russell
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1971-04       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  Syncope and aortic stenosis: significance of conduction abnormalities.

Authors:  D Gann; H Fernandes; P Samet
Journal:  Eur J Cardiol       Date:  1979-05

7.  Intracardiac conduction intervals in children with congenital heart disease: comparison of His bundle studies in 41 normal children and 307 patients with congenital cardiac defects.

Authors:  A R Levin; J I Haft; M A Engle; K H Ehlers; A A Klein
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1977-02       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  Left bundle branch block: a predictor of poor left ventricular function in coronary artery disease.

Authors:  R I Hamby; R H Weissman; M N Prakash; I Hoffman
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 4.749

9.  Electrophysiologic studies in patients with bundle branch block.

Authors:  M M Scheinman; R W Peters; F Morady; M J Sauvé; P Malone; G Modin
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 1.976

10.  Significance of the HV interval in 517 patients with chronic bifascicular block.

Authors:  R C Dhingra; E Palileo; B Strasberg; S Swiryn; R A Bauernfeind; C R Wyndham; K M Rosen
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1981-12       Impact factor: 29.690

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.