Literature DB >> 6742216

Hemodynamics and interstitial fluid pressure in the rat tail.

K Aukland, H Wiig.   

Abstract

Blood flow in the rat was measured during pentobarbital anesthesia by plethysmographic and thermometric techniques. Tail arterial and venous pressures (Pa and Pv) were measured by glass micropipettes and interstitial fluid pressure (PIF) by wick-in-needle technique. Large pressure gradients were measured along the tail, Pa decreasing and Pv increasing toward the tip. In the vasoconstricted tail, distal arterial and venous pressures (Pad and Pvd, respectively, 10 cm from the tail root) were 55 and 11% of aortic pressure (PA), while PIF was 0-2 mmHg. Plasma volume expansion increased blood flow by a factor of 10 to 35. Pad rose to 74% and Pvd to 20% of PA. PIF increased to 15 mmHg, in parallel with Pv. Venous stasis (cuff pressure 14.7 mmHg) increased PIF and Pv by 3.5 and 9 mmHg, respectively, while tail volume increased by 0.4 to 1.2%. In conclusion, the large flow increase induced by plasma volume expansion depends strongly on dilation of the tail artery, with two- to threefold increase in internal radius. Simultaneously the tail veins relax and expand. Subcutaneous tissue is compressed between the expanding vessels and the tight skin, and PIF increases almost sufficiently to prevent a rise in net capillary filtration pressure. This immediate edema-preventing mechanism is less efficient during venous stasis, which presumably does not induce "active" dilation of the tail vessels. Similar mechanisms probably exist in other "encapsulated" tissues.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6742216     DOI: 10.1152/ajpheart.1984.247.1.H80

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Physiol        ISSN: 0002-9513


  2 in total

1.  Focally recorded single sympathetic postganglionic neuronal activity supplying rat lateral tail vein.

Authors:  C D Johnson; M P Gilbey
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1998-04-15       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Maternal engineered nanomaterial exposure and fetal microvascular function: does the Barker hypothesis apply?

Authors:  Phoebe A Stapleton; Valerie C Minarchick; Jinghai Yi; Kevin Engels; Carroll R McBride; Timothy R Nurkiewicz
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013-04-30       Impact factor: 8.661

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.