Literature DB >> 6741986

Factors affecting sensitivity and specificity of exercise electrocardiography. Multivariable analysis.

M A Hlatky, D B Pryor, F E Harrell, R M Califf, D B Mark, R A Rosati.   

Abstract

Unlike the predictive value of a diagnostic test, which depends on the prevalence of disease in the population tested, its sensitivity and specificity have been assumed to be constants. This assumption was examined in patients who had both exercise electrocardiography and cardiac catheterization. The effects on sensitivity of factors from clinical history, catheterization, and exercise performance were defined by multivariable logistic regression analysis in 1,401 patients with coronary disease; effects on specificity were defined by a similar analysis in 868 patients without coronary disease. Five factors had significant, independent effects on exercise electrocardiographic sensitivity: maximal exercise heart rate, number of diseased coronary arteries, type of angina, and the patient's age and sex. Only maximal exercise heart rate had a significant, independent effect on exercise electrocardiographic specificity. Thus, the sensitivity and specificity of exercise electrocardiography vary with clinical history, extent of disease, and treadmill performance; the sensitivity and specificity of other diagnostic tests may also vary.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6741986     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9343(84)90437-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med        ISSN: 0002-9343            Impact factor:   4.965


  42 in total

Review 1.  [Methodology of diagnostic validation studies. Errors in planning and analysis].

Authors:  K Jensen; U Abel
Journal:  Med Klin (Munich)       Date:  1999-09-15

2.  Three decades of research on computer applications in health care: medical informatics support at the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.

Authors:  J Michael Fitzmaurice; Karen Adams; John M Eisenberg
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2002 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 3.  Designing studies to ensure that estimates of test accuracy are transferable.

Authors:  Les Irwig; Patrick Bossuyt; Paul Glasziou; Constantine Gatsonis; Jeroen Lijmer
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-03-16

Review 4.  Misguided efforts and future challenges for research on "diagnostic tests".

Authors:  A R Feinstein
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 3.710

Review 5.  The true treatment benefit is unpredictable in clinical trials using surrogate outcome measured with diagnostic tests.

Authors:  Behrouz Kassaï; Nirav R Shah; Alain Leizorovicza; Michel Cucherat; Francois Gueyffier; Jean-Pierre Boissel
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 6.437

Review 6.  Diagnostic and prognostic value of ambulatory ECG (Holter) monitoring in patients with coronary heart disease: a review.

Authors:  C Michael Gibson; Lauren N Ciaglo; Matthew C Southard; Shaun Takao; Caitlin Harrigan; Jason Lewis; Jason Filopei; Michelle Lew; Sabina A Murphy; Jacqueline Buros
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 2.300

7.  Angina pectoris: has the cornerstone of symptomatic coronary artery disease been moved?

Authors:  Renee C Hessian; Rob S B Beanlands
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 5.223

8.  Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations for diagnostic tests and strategies.

Authors:  Holger J Schünemann; A Holger J Schünemann; Andrew D Oxman; Jan Brozek; Paul Glasziou; Roman Jaeschke; Gunn E Vist; John W Williams; Regina Kunz; Jonathan Craig; Victor M Montori; Patrick Bossuyt; Gordon H Guyatt
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2008-05-17

9.  Headache response to glyceryl trinitrate in patients with and without obstructive coronary artery disease.

Authors:  D H Hsi; A Roshandel; N Singh; T Szombathy; Z S Meszaros
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 10.  Management of stable angina.

Authors:  A Jain; V Wadehra; A D Timmis
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.401

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.